Forum:TC:Dark Forces saga

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Dark Forces saga

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.—Silly Dan (talk) 01:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Dark Forces saga (talk - history - links - logs)

Why on this green Earth are there separate articles for appearances? This one's just a mess anyway, with info that's already in the other articles mentioned/covered. Not even worth a merge.--Goodwood Redstarbird (Alliance Intelligence) 20:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete

  1. Goodwood Redstarbird (Alliance Intelligence) 20:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. Imperialles 16:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Keep as an introduction to the series (as in X-wing computer game series) but remove the insanely long and pointless list. Green Tentacle (Talk) 00:26, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. Per GT. Graestan(Talk) 04:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. Per Green. Unit 8311 15:55, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. What they ^ said. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 16:46, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  5. Per Tent. jSarek 21:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  6. Keep, but pointless list? If the appearances sections aren't satisfied here, can we then create a Dark Forces index like we do for other new continuity? -- Riffsyphon1024 22:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  7. GT makes sense. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 16:44, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  8. Per GT. Din's Fire 997 21:13, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
  9. Ozzel 21:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
  10. KEJ 14:56, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
  11. GT and Riff make good points; I'd support either one, since I believe that the saga deserves its own article. Greyman(Talk) 15:01, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
  12. Per Green Tentacle Cyfiero II Jedi Order(Comlink) 06:37, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
  13. I'd prefer we did something similar to Callista trilogy with this and turned it into a disambig page. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 16:45, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
  14. Per Ataru: this is every bit a legitimate as Callista trilogy. It's arguably as legitimate a subject for an article, though not as significant, as Prequel trilogy. —Silly Dan (talk) 01:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)