Forum:TC:Crofyp's task force

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Crofyp's task force

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep. Imperators II(Talk) 07:55, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Crofyp's task force (talk - history - links - logs - delete - protect)

Crofyp's task force — The two ships in this "task force" were simply dispatched together to Rapacc, there was a superior officer (General Crofyp) and an inferior officer (Colonel Tildnis), however, they did not communicate nor did the ships (Anvil and Hammer) communicate nor work together. One shielded the other (Superior shielded the inferior) and the superior fought in the battle, the inferior fought a bit and nothing more.

Thrawn Ascendancy: Lesser Evil doesn't state that the two ships were a task force. They were simply dispatched to the same system at the same time. (In fact, the superior didn't care about the other ship at all) — Samonic ChissAscendancyCanonSymbol 13:45, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Delete

— Samonic ChissAscendancyCanonSymbol 13:45, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
I'd also add that the grouping of the two ships is not a distinct subject of its own, so it shouldn't deserve an article of its own. OOM 224 13:48, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
  1. Imperators II(Talk) 13:49, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Keep

  1. ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 13:50, 9 April 2022 (UTC) "Adding in the necessity for the two ships of Crofyp's small task force to stay together, that dropped the entry points to really only one."- Lesser Evil Hardcover pg. 125
  2. NBDani (talk) 13:56, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
  3. Looking at the quote ThrawnChiss listed, Samonic's points seem redundant to me. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 13:57, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
  4. OOM 224 14:02, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
  5. Apologies for the inconveniences.— Samonic ChissAscendancyCanonSymbol 14:18, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
  6. Rsand 30 (talk) 17:14, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
  7. --Vitus InfinitusTalk 17:22, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
  8. VergenceScatter (talk) 19:52, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
  9. —spookywillowwtalk 17:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
  10. Lewisr (talk) 19:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
  11. Wok142 (talk) 08:00, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
  12. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 13:38, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
  13. 1358 (Talk) 15:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
  14. I do think a lot of our task force articles may be speculation, but this seems to pass muster. Corellian PremierRogue SquadronMTFBWY 14:13, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
  15. .Fan26 (Talk) 16:52, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Comments

  • About the quote User ThrawnChiss7 listed, I do not find it in my book with the same format. However, I have been informed that it is in fact there. My apologies.— Samonic ChissAscendancyCanonSymbol 14:09, 9 April 2022 (UTC)