Forum:TC:Category:Non-Force-sensitive Lightsaber Users

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Category:Non-Force-sensitive Lightsaber Users

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Category:Non-Force-sensitive Lightsaber Users ([[Talk:Category:Non-Force-sensitive_Lightsaber_Users|talk]] - history - links - logs)

Ridiculously unencylopedic. A category for everyone who ever touched a lightsaber once while not being a Jedi? Do we get Category:Jedi who used blasters once? We don't need to categorize everything under the sun -- this is just trivia. Save categories for things that are sensible, substantial, and meaningful. Havac 00:40, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Delete

  1. Havac 00:40, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  2. WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:46, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  3. Grunny (Talk) 00:48, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  4. Graestan(Talk) 00:50, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  5. It's not even using {{Subcat|}} like it should! SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 00:50, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  6. Headshot! IFYLOFD (You will pay the price for your lack of vision!) 00:54, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  7. Bold Clone 01:02, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  8. Supermegaultrahyperdelete. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 01:10, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  9. There it goes. MauserComlink 09:53, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  10. Kill it! Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 09:55, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  11. Foreshore --Eyrezer 11:02, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  12. No brainer. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 11:03, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  13. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 18:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  14. Sigh. —Lucius malfoy7 Nute777 (Give it up for Lil' 'Soka Tano, ladies and gents!) 21:44, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
  15. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 22:57, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Considering that lightsabers usually need Force-sensitivity to be able to wield properly, I think this is a meaningful and useful criterion. It obviously needs more stringent criteria than "having touched a lightsaber"; having built or used one in combat seems a useful method of sorting, since those are things invariably requiring Force-sensitivity (as opposed to Han using it for a few seconds as a Swiss army knife). - Lord Hydronium 23:04, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
  2. Per Hydro. Master JonathanJedi Council Chambers 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  3. This is Star Wars. The event of a non-force user wielding a lightsaber is a rare enough event to be note worthy. Where else is one to find this info, if not on Wookieepedia? Every single article on here is trivia according to wikipedia guidelines! Keep it. It hasn't done anything bad to you. Oh, and Han has used Luke's in combat...but so has an Ewok. IthinkIwannaLeia 16:07, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Comments