Forum:TC:All clear signal

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:All clear signal

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. I also added the pertinent information to listening post as was requested by four users in the forum. Graestan(Talk) 00:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

All clear signal (talk - history - links - logs)

Self-explanatory term.

Delete

  1. Gonk (Gonk!) 22:01, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
  2. Jaden Kenobi HK-47 22:05, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
  3. Good grief. Thefourdotelipsis 22:06, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
  4. Wait, we don't have a Self-explanatory article? Clearly, we must create it, because the term has been used in Star Wars! jSarek 22:31, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
  5. … Graestan(Talk) 22:32, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
  6. Green Tentacle (Talk) 22:38, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
  7. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:57, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
  8. Mauser 08:38, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
  9. I need a name (Complain here) 17:53, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
  10. Ozzel 07:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
  11. Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 10:52, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
  12. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 22:50, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
  13. IFYLOFD (And now, young Skywalker, you will die.) 05:13, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
  14. Chack Jadson (Talk) 00:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Maybe I'm weird, but I find it strange that so many people are voting to delete an article about a non-tangible subject that is identified by name in the Star Wars universe while in (an)other(s) some of the same people voted to keep what was at least at the time thought to be an article about a non-tangible subject which wasn't identified by name or referred to directly. I'm stumped. I'm aware we're not Wikipedia, but it covers the real world and we cover the Star Wars world in which this signal exists yet I wouldn't expect everyone here to want it gone from there, too. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 17:39, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
  2. Per Acky. The current article may not be that well-written, but it's a canonical topic. Havac 21:43, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
    • I thought about that, Havac. But then I thought, "is it possible for it to be well-written?" My argument isn't based on its canonicity. We wouldn't have an article for "waving hello." Gonk (Gonk!) 23:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
  3. Because of that one very last sentence, I would say it has just enough Star Wars-only detail to be exempt from both real-world-counterpart and self-explanatory logic. Wildyoda 03:43, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
  4. Per Wildyoda. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 01:25, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
  5. Greyman(Talk) 01:37, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
  6. Keep, but do whatever possible to clean it up. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 00:00, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Merge with some other thing somewhere

  1. I feel this information is better suited elsewhere. I don't think it's quite enough to warrant its own article, but it could be a useful tidbit on the base's or Republic's pages. —Xwing328(Talk) 20:56, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
  2. Per Xwing. QuiGonJinnThe ability to speak does not make you intelligent.Quigonheadshot 17:23, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
  3. Per Xwing as well. Dr.Kermit(Babble here) 01:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
  4. This is going to happen eventually anyway. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 00:13, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Is there a page of signals and stuff, like tracking beacons, all clear signals, etc. that we could merge this into? Dr.Kermit(Babble here) 03:57, 13 November 2008 (UTC)