Forum:TC:2015, 2016, and 2017

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:2015, 2016, and 2017

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:29, September 29, 2012 (UTC)

2015 and beyond

I believe it would be wise to delete this page along with 2016 and 2017. The reason of this is because we now have no idea as to when the Original Trilogy 3D films will be released. All we do know is that Episodes II & III will be released back-to-back next year so... I guess that's it. --Darth R2-D2, Dark Lord of the Droids (talk) 21:19, September 5, 2012 (UTC)

Delete

  1. @ DigiFluid. So we just keep a blank page with nothing on it until we get something? --Darth R2-D2, Dark Lord of the Droids (talk) 21:40, September 6, 2012 (UTC)

Keep

  1. I'm an eventualist. They may not have good stuff now, but I think it's pointless to delete them just for them to be recreated later on. Just leave 'em up, remove the junk, and let em be. — DigiFluid(Whine here) 02:28, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Perhaps we should. We have minimal links to them as it is. The readers won't begrudge us for keeping pages they're only going to see if they go looking for them. And if they do find them, it'll tell them there's nothing yet planned. What's wrong with that? The absence of a page may make them think we might be missing info. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 06:28, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Agreed. Cade Calrayn GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit 22:03, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Also agreed. —Silly Dan (talk) 23:28, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
  5. 501st dogma(talk) 23:33, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
    Agreed. I love this wiki and hate when pages are needlessly deleted.Opress100 (talk) 01:28, September 10, 2012 (UTC) (Vote struck, reason: Per policy: User is banned -- JangFett (Talk) 22:00, September 12, 2012 (UTC))
  6. Only because we do have something listed on each page, even if it is from a dubious source. If they were empty pages, I'd say delete. Menkooroo (talk) 05:44, September 11, 2012 (UTC)
  7. Meh. 1358 (Talk) 14:15, September 11, 2012 (UTC)
  8. Agreed. Corellian PremierRobotechAll along the watchtower 22:12, September 11, 2012 (UTC)
  9. Per Digi Winterz (talk) 11:21, September 12, 2012 (UTC)
  10. Clone Commander Lee Talk 14:53, September 12, 2012 (UTC)
  11. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 22:09, September 12, 2012 (UTC)
  12. Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 13:01, September 13, 2012 (UTC)
  13. —Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 00:14, September 14, 2012 (UTC)
  14. Sources? Where we're going we don't need... sources. DD97Which bear is best? 20:59, September 15, 2012 (UTC)
  15. Cumulonimbus Cloud (ℳeeting ℛoom) 21:30, September 17, 2012 (UTC)

Discussion

As a purely clerical matter, I have combined the 2016 and 2017 nominations into this one. There is no reason that each must or even should be debated separately, since any reason for or against will apply equally to all three. I have also added standard voting headers, but I have no opinion myself yet. —MJ— Holocomm Thursday, September 6, 2012, 02:26 UTC