Forum:TC:1890s

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:1890s

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Grunny (talk) 04:08, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

1890s (talk - history - links - logs)

There is no reason to have an article for the decade that some obscure person founded a publishing company that would publish the Dutch versions of Star Wars novels over a century later. Add in all the individuals 1890-1899 articles (which are also included in this TC) that redirect here, and it just adds to the absurdity. - JMAS Jolly Trooper Hey, it's me! 00:46, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

Delete (including all ten 1890-1899 pages)

  1. JMAS Jolly Trooper Hey, it's me! 00:46, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Yeah, I probably shouldn't of made all of those redirects just for the one thing... --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 01:45, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:51, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
  4. CC7567 (talk) 01:53, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
  5. —Master Jonathan New Jedi Order (Jedi Council Chambers) 02:18, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 02:39, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 02:52, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
  8. OLIOSTER (talk) 04:39, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
  9. Cylka-talk- 05:27, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
  10. -- 1358 (Talk) 06:11, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
  11. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 08:14, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
  12. Clone Commander Lee Talk 17:56, September 13, 2010 (UTC)
  13. Chack Jadson (Talk) 21:20, September 13, 2010 (UTC)
  14. I should have done this years ago. LtNOWIS 08:26, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
  15. Wipe them out. All of them. -- Riffsyphon1024 09:44, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

Comments

There really is no reason to have a "Merge" option as the relevant information should already be in the J. M. Meulenhoff article. - JMAS Jolly Trooper Hey, it's me! 00:46, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

  • Somebody be sure to de-link the 1895 in his article, too. Dangerdan97 21:08, September 13, 2010 (UTC)