Forum:CT:RFR requirements

Forums > Consensus track archive > CT:RFR requirements

This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made in the Senate Hall or new Consensus Track pages rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record. The result was to add the proposed requirements to the Request for Rollback process. Greyman(Paratus) 16:55, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

The current requirements for requests for rollback are as follows:

  1. They have an account under a screenname.
  2. They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
  3. They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.

I propose that we add a few more requirements, namely:

  1. Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
  2. Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)

This would close the loophole that currently allows any RFR to pass, regardless of opposing votes.

Please do not add any further options to this consensus track. --Imperialles 14:16, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

For addition

  1. Per myself. --Imperialles 14:16, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Wow. Graestan(Talk) 14:19, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. —Silly Dan (talk) 14:24, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Um, how did we miss this? -- Darth Culator (Talk) 14:26, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Per Culator. Master Aban Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 14:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  6. Loophole? Fire at will, commander. Despite the fact that it's like candy. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 15:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  7. Per Culator. Jorrel Wiki-shrinkable Fraajic 19:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  8. Who is responsible for this humialting mistake? WHO?! Unit 8311 20:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  9. Like slightly more difficult candy. Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  10. Yes. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:01, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  11. Per Green Tentacle. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 21:41, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  12. —Xwing328(Talk) 17:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
  13. Gonk (Gonk!) 12:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  14. Ozzel 02:48, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
  15. Greyman(Paratus) 03:04, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
  16. Per Culator! Sheesh. Hobbes(Tiger's Lair) 03:18, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Against addition

Comments

See also Forum:CT Archive/Rollback rights. —Silly Dan (talk) 14:24, 6 February 2008 (UTC)