Forum:CT:New Republic X-wing

This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made in the Senate Hall or new Consensus track pages rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was Requested withdrawn; as supposed to be a TC not a CT. —spookywillowwtalk 17:46, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Forums > Consensus track archive > CT:New Republic X-wing

Hey guys, I recently created a page for the New Republic X-wing when User:Cade Calrayn redirected it to the T-65 X-wing starfighter page, even though there's a Databank article for it. But I want to hear what you think. Should we keep the redirect or split it? Elijah Palmer (talk) 15:29, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Keep redirect

Support

Oppose

Discuss

Remove redirect

Support

  1. Elijah Palmer (talk) 15:29, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Oppose

Discuss

  • By the way, the Forum:Trash compactor handles move/redirect/keep/delete disputes. The CT is not really the most optimal place for this.—spookywillowwtalk 15:31, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
  • The aforementioned Databank entry (StarWars-DatabankII New Republic X-Wings in the Databank (backup link)) reads "The venerable Incom T-65 design continues to serve proudly in the fleets of the new Republic [...]". Cade's case is clear cut here. NanoLuukeCloning Facility 15:36, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
    • Yeah, this CT is not really able to actually put anything into policy. Elijah, as I pointed out repeatedly in my edit summary, the Databank itself calls the X-wings just normal T-65 X-wings. We don't do articles for "Government-version of Ship X"; I understand you're enthusiastic about creating articles but you really need to actually do the research to see if an article is actually necessary. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 15:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
    • Ok, sorry about that! You can close this now. Elijah Palmer (talk) 15:39, 17 January 2025 (UTC)