Forum:CT:CC-1119 to Appo

Forums > Consensus track archive > CT:CC-1119 to Appo

This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made in the Senate Hall or new Consensus Track pages rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was oppose moving CC-1119 to Appo. - Sikon 09:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Hey, I'm proposing that we move CC-1119 to his most known and common name, Appo, and do the same with other clone articles. It just feels more natural, since no one would look for "CC-1119" or other complicated clone designations such as "CT-0000/1010".

So, do we go for the known names, or the technical ones? Stake black msg 22:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

  1. Stake black msg 22:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC) Well, you guys changed my mind :) Stake black msg 01:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
    I support your proposal. For now. (sinister laughter) Gonk (Gonk!) 22:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
    Jinko 22:44, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
    With caveat (see comments) - JMAS 22:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
    OK, looks like Appo is his name and CC-1119 is his mil designation. -Fnlayson 22:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Object

  1. ATATatarismall.png 22:50, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. It redirects, and the designation [in this case, CC-1119] is more accurate. tzzA 22:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  3. Borsk Fey'lya 22:56, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  4. Per Imp's IRC comment: "Why go with the most popular name when we can have both completely accurate titles *and* redirects?" Gonk (Gonk!) 22:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  5. CC-1119 = official name given at "birth." Appo = adopted nickname, like Sidious, Tyranus, etc. —Xwing328(Talk) 23:00, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  6. Real names, not nicknames. jSarek 23:02, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  7. Yeah, on second thought, there is no need. - JMAS 23:05, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  8. What JMAS said. - Jinko 23:08, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  9. .... 00:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  10. Muuuuuurgh 00:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  11. Per jSarek. Adamwankenobi 00:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  12. Although how do you explain Greivous, when it sould be Qymaen jai Sheelal?--Doquis(HoloConference)CzerkaCorporationLogo-KOTOR 16:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
    • It was an actual change of name, rather than a nickname. He stopped going by Qymean and became Grievous, whereas Appo retained his designation as CC-1119. jSarek 17:19, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  13. CC-1119 prevents disambiguation. -- Riffsyphon1024 17:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  14. Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  15. Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 10:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

  • I think this is a good idea. However, I think the CC-1119, and the designators for all the other clone troopers should remain in the title. Have them be like "CC-1119 'Appo'" or something like that. Then have "CC-1119" and "Appo" redirect the the proper article. - JMAS 22:53, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.