This section is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This section is no longer live.
The result of the debate was to use option 4 - File:BobaFettMain2.jpg. —Xwing328(Talk) 00:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
I don't like the Boba Fett main image. I know that's my opinion, and we already decided it (with some fights along the way), but according to policy, this is the best one:
It's better than the current one in two ways:
1. We started using pics for everything that were portraits, headshots, and head-and-shoulders.
2. It shows him at the latest time we have him, and is in good quality, per the Manual of Style, and Obi-Wan Kenobi.
Does anybody get it? No? Vote here.---Vladius Magnum(Clan Magnum) 22:10, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Contents
Options
<gallery> File:BobaFett-BloodlinesCover.jpg|''Bloodlines'' bookcover Promotional from ESB File:Boba-CHRON1.jpg|Option 3 File:BobaFettMain2.jpg|Option 4 File:BobaFettMain3.jpg|Option 5 File:Boba0001.jpg|Option 6 File:Boba fett tos.jpg|Option 7 </gallery>
Bloodlines Bookcover
---Vladius Magnum(Clan Magnum) 22:10, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Promotional from ESB
Yoshi626 08:48, 25 December 2006 (UTC)I need a name (Complain here) 14:33, 27 December 2006 (UTC)MaclimesZero 22:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC)Like this one better. Some cropping at the bottom would help. 23:00, 27 December 2006 (UTC)It's a sad day when people prefer artists rendition to the real thing. --Redemption
Talk 23:03, 27 December 2006 (UTC)JMAS 01:43, 28 December 2006 (UTC)Per JSarek. Atarumaster88(Audience Chamber) 04:39, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Come on already. This better be the last vote. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
20:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Option 3
- Changed my vote to this. A little cropping at top and sides would help. -Fnlayson 18:24, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- What cropping could you do? Crop the top and you chop off the top of the missile. The sides a little bit maybe. - JMAS 18:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Option 4
- Changed again. This is now my first choice, followed by the ESB promo. - JMAS 06:50, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Redemption
Talk 13:05, 31 December 2006 (UTC) - I need a name (Complain here) 13:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Did this change? It doesn't look like the same Option 4 from before. Admittedly, I could be delirious. Maclimes Zero (talk)
20:42, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Atarumaster88
(Audience Chamber) 06:15, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yoshi626 23:49, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Option 5
- The best option here by far. Havac 04:01, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Option 6
Well lit, no background, high quality, upper body shot... It's a winner. MaclimesZero 18:32, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Option 7
- What the heck? NOBODY picked 7?!---Vladius Magnum(Clan Magnum) 02:04, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Seven! Seven's mine! They stole it! I thought we agreed on Soda! .... 07:01, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Other?
These two would be good candidates for the main image. I know that I was the one who suggested the current one, but I think it looks a bit weird since it was brightened up... Borsk Fey'lya 16:18, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, hell yeah. The first one. Without a doubt. Perfect. Clean and crisp. --Redemption
Talk 18:10, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'd go for the first one only if the current main one wouldn't win. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
20:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- I went ahead and moved those to replace OPtions 4 and Options 5 which had no votes. And with those two now there, I think I like the new Option 4 best.JMAS 06:50, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'd go for the first one only if the current main one wouldn't win. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
Comments
- I'm still strongly of the opinion that clear live-action shots should be preferred over artistic ones, regardless of other concerns. That said, I'm sure we could do better than the ESB promo. jSarek 08:43, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- How about some new options then? Any of the three I added to the options strike anyone's fancy? - JMAS 17:12, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- 3 is too distracting. 4 is bad quality. And 5 is a bad angle. --Redemption
Talk 17:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- All the images I added as options are immensely better quality than the current image being used. - JMAS 18:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what your looking at but they are of horrible quality. One could say that your having the same monitor problems as Tnu. --Redemption
Talk 18:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- JMAS, those images are just plain horrible. It's the truth. If the majority would, for some reason, vote for one of those, I'd have to replace it because of their poor qualities. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
20:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Groan... I'm sorry I wasted your time everybody. I just don't like any of the options we have right now, and according to our de-facto policy we should have headshots and what they looked like at the latest time. There has to be a solution; on Luke Skywalker we got a really good headshot and it seemed like we had to dig for it. I don't prefer Artwork over Real or vice-versa, rather, which is better looking.---Vladius Magnum(Clan Magnum) 18:03, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- JMAS, those images are just plain horrible. It's the truth. If the majority would, for some reason, vote for one of those, I'd have to replace it because of their poor qualities. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- I'm not sure what your looking at but they are of horrible quality. One could say that your having the same monitor problems as Tnu. --Redemption
- All the images I added as options are immensely better quality than the current image being used. - JMAS 18:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- 3 is too distracting. 4 is bad quality. And 5 is a bad angle. --Redemption
- How about some new options then? Any of the three I added to the options strike anyone's fancy? - JMAS 17:12, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- If there aren't anymore votes then I assume that Option 4 is our winner? --Redemption
Talk 22:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.