- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of monthly Wookieepedian of the Month nominations. Please do not modify it.
Nominations for January 2006
StarNeptune
- This is a tough one for me since there have been so many great contributors in the past few months. I will have to split my vote between StarNeptune and Kuralyov, both great and helpful in their own right. -- Riffsyphon1024 20:11, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- StarNeptune. --MarcK [talk] 22:51, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Got to be StarNeptune - QuentinGeorge 22:54, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- For all the work she's done and keeps doing, I'm just going to keep voting StarNeptune (this is the third month, now) until she wins. Want me to stop being a broken record? Follow the lead of the wise chaps above me and make it so I have to actually think about this vote for at least the next six months. jSarek 02:21, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Ditto. WhiteBoy 05:42, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- It takes a lot more patience than I have to categorize something as massive as all those planets. Kuralyov 07:22, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- For doing a huge job that nobody else wants to do :-) --Azizlight 14:35, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- StarNeptune. (Are there other Canadians here that we can give the honour to in January, so the Dominion can go three-for-three? 8) ) — Silly Dan 14:52, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- I agree. Padme829 01:35, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)Padme829
- StarNeptune -- Hollis 23:47, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- It's tough, but my vote this month goes to StarNeptune Shadowtrooper talk 18:56, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Comments:
- I suppose this means we can nominate administrators now? --Imp 18:41, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Technically, they didn't nominate an admin. I had regular user status until three days ago. It's up to the other admins to decide whether or not I am still eligible for WotM. StarNeptune 19:01, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- For my part, I see no reason to punish someone for being good enough to become an admin. I say if you get nominated before your adminship, you should still be eligible to win. jSarek 22:10, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- I see no problem considering the voting started before she became an admin. -- Riffsyphon1024 01:47, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- For my part, I see no reason to punish someone for being good enough to become an admin. I say if you get nominated before your adminship, you should still be eligible to win. jSarek 22:10, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, we had the discussion a while back, and (more or less unanimously among those in the discussion) decided that we would allow admins to be WotM. WhiteBoy 10:08, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Technically, they didn't nominate an admin. I had regular user status until three days ago. It's up to the other admins to decide whether or not I am still eligible for WotM. StarNeptune 19:01, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Kuralyov
- This is a tough one for me since there have been so many great contributors in the past few months. I will have to split my vote between StarNeptune and Kuralyov, both great and helpful in their own right. -- Riffsyphon1024 20:11, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Jasca Ducato 18:54, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.