Wookieepedia:Wookieepedian of the Month/August 2006

< Wookieepedia:Wookieepedian of the Month
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of monthly Wookieepedian of the Month nominations. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Borsk Fey'lya
    • 1.1 Support
    • 1.2 Objections
    • 1.3 Comments
  • 2 Erik Pflueger
    • 2.1 Support
    • 2.2 Objections
    • 2.3 Comments
  • 3 MediaWiki default
  • 4 Support
  • 5 Objections
  • 6 Comments
  • 7 Roron Corobb
  • 8 Support
  • 9 Objections
  • 10 Comments

Borsk Fey'lya

Support

  1. AdamwankenobiTalk to me! My home. 19:01, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  2. Kuralyov 05:54, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  3. Breathesgelatin 15:58, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  4. Cull Tremayne 05:46, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  5. --Xwing328(Talk) 03:46, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  6. MyNz 06:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  7. --Eyrezer 07:19, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  8. Snoop 17:41, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

  • For a long time I've watched this guy tirelessly work on articles on the wiki, fixing much of the formatting and such. He's a great contributor well due for the recognition! AdamwankenobiTalk to me! My home. 19:01, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Number 6 all time editor with almost 9000 edits. He deserves it. Cull Tremayne 05:46, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
    • How did you find that out? Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 20:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
      • The Stats page, I assume. #15! Woo! - Kwenn 20:39, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
        • Wow, second place! Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 20:43, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
          • One of our best contributors. MyNz 06:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Erik Pflueger

Support

  1. SFH 20:42, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  2. I'm not voting for anyone else for WotM until Erik wins, even if that means I never vote for anyone else again. -- Darth Culator 22:07, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  3. Dumac 05:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  4. I'll agree with the rest for once. ;) -- Riffsyphon1024 05:50, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  5. Cato Neimoidia 18:45, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  6. If Erik doesn't win this time, I'm going to go insane. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 18:56, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  7. He must win this time. He's been nominated for over 4 months now, and still hasn't won. I'm not saying Borsk isn't good, but Erik just deserves it.Master Secura
  8. WhiteBoy 20:27, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  9. Erik! Erik! Erik! Erik! KEJ 16:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  10. "I love democracy... and I love the work Erik has done." Cutch 23:28, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  11. Eric has done a lot since he arrived here, he deserves to win --Darth Mantus 14:22, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  12. Darth Kevinmhk 03:42, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  13. Fatguy2006 19:52, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  14. CooperTFN 06:50, 13 July 2006 (UTC) If I have to do this one more time, I'm staging a coup.
  15. Skippy Farlstendoiro 06:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC) - I'm with Erik and his Palpatine article.
  16. Volemlock 17:45, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

#-- Snoop 14:17, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

  • He has done great work on Palpatine, and has now expanded into Star Wars: Legacy. -- SFH 20:42, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree i have browsed through hundreds of articles and Palpatine is easily has the most infomation.
    • Can someone explain why people so desperately feel Erik needs to get this? I hadn't even noticed him until I saw he was nominated last month. The Palpatine page doesn't interest me, so I never spotted him there. He's not on the stat page above, and he doesn't seem to have made a major contributions outside Palpatine. I have nothing against the guy, but can someone explain this popularity to me? --Eyrezer 01:32, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
      • He has done other notable work, like Beilert Valance, and a lot of work on Legacy stuff. And his writing has inspired others. -- Darth Culator 01:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
        • Most of his stuff is wildly POV and written in a completely un-encyclopedic manner. Kuralyov 18:54, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
          • Last time I checked, NPOV was a good thing. 69.210.82.54 18:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
        • Edit counts are only useful so far. For example, a complete article rewrite is much more valuable than a minor maintenance tagging or spelling correction; however, measuring edit counts doesn't reflect this. RMF 02:36, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
          • Yeah, I'm aware of that. --Eyrezer 03:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

MediaWiki default

Support

  1. Azizlight 06:06, 12 July 2006 (UTC) :-P

Objections

Comments

  • This user hasn't been contributing for quite a while, but he was quite instrumental in getting the wiki up and running. - Sikon [Talk] 16:40, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Have you gone mad, Sikon? Seriously though, how can we treat them like a Wookieepedian when all they do is start wikis on wikia. Back then this was nothing. -- Riffsyphon1024 07:50, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
      • It's a joke, obviously. - Sikon [Talk] 08:26, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
        • MediaWiki Default is like a deadbeat parent. Has anyone seen him around lately? All MediaWiki Default does is go around making baby wikis and then abandoning them. -- Darth Culator 11:14, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
          • I get the joke now. Though, lol at Culator. -- Riffsyphon1024 05:58, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Roron Corobb

Support

  1. Darth Fear 01:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Objections

Comments