This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. The article remains, now sourced. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was Keep. SparqMan 18:56, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Yavin 7
- I think there is nothing to say about each of the lesser Yavin moons, I marked Yavin 2 and Yavin 10 for speedy deletion as they were created with no sources by an anonymous and the suspected vandal Hatheway, but Yavin 7 was created by JustinGann providing sources (though I think they are more likely just appearances). My vote is that if Star Wars Missions source has no relevant info about Yavin 7, Delete this article. --Thinortolan 13:29, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- I say Keep; no matter how unnotable and boring the article may be, if it exists, it belongs. --MarcK [talk] 14:47, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. We have been told how many moons Yavin has and been shown their naming scheme. Therefore, even just listing that Yavin 7 is the seventh moon of Yavin is sufficient and useful. --SparqMan 22:25, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, but remove the crap about it being colonized by Bothans. (Seriously...WTF) StarNeptune 15:03, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- OK, I vote keep, because the foldout map of the Yavin system that came with SW Missions identified the four moons of Yavin shown on the Death Star readout from ANH as being Yavin 4, 7, 8, and 13. Why did the DS show just these four moons? I don't know, but I suspect that means these were the 4 out of 26 capable of supporting life and/or suspected of housing a Rebel base. As far as I know, no canon source puts any canon race on this moon, let alone Bothans. I will edit it!
- Keep, given new edits.