Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Vader's Wrath

< Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Silly Dan (talk) 02:06, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents

  • 1 Vader's Wrath
  • 2 Keep
  • 3 Delete
  • 4 Comments
  • 5 From talk page
    • 5.1 +Tidy up
    • 5.2 +Is this real or not

Vader's Wrath

I still think this is simply gameplay mechanics, the move itself is more like a build up of kinetic energy being exherted through the ground. The name is just useless, as the article clearly states Palps and Mace can use it to, so why not Mace's wrath or Palp's wrath. It simply doesn't work, and either needs to be majorly changed, merged with Force TK or deleted. Jedi Dude 17:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep

Delete

  1. Bodknocks 05:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  2. Angel Blue 451 18:15, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  3. Jedi Dude 11:22, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  4. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) (Data file) Imperial Emblem 19:18, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  5. TopAce 19:20, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments

The only source is the Episode III game? So, in the game, it is called "Vader's Wrath", and also in the same game Mace and Palpatine can do the move as well? Am I understanding that correctly? -BaronGrackle 05:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

    • see what i have said in the talk page of the article, but yes essentially. Jedi Dude 11:22, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
      • well? all deletes no keeps? Jedi Dude 19:16, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Why not just merge this with the ROTS game article? Bonko 19:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
    • No. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 21:50, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Delete it!!!!! Jedi Dude 01:04, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Is there a generic variant of the same article? DAWUSS 01:20, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

From talk page

I smell Fanon. -- SFH 20:42, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

You're right. This indeed is fanon. -- MyNz 02:07, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Actually, it is a power up move in the SW EP.III GBA game.

sooooooooooooo...It's propably not cannon P.h 22:24, 18 January 2006 (UTC)p.h

  • The question is: is a power up move in a game part of game mechanics, or recognized as canon? -- Riffsyphon1024 06:03, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  • I would argue that almost all of the "Force powers" are simply game mechanics. I doubt that a Jedi Master would say, "Now you will learn the power of 'Force grip'". --SparqMan 06:11, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  • So does that mean force grip isn't canon? Linkman95 19:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Using the Force to grip someone is canon. But Jedi don't pause their situation while they call up an inventory to Select Your Force Power. The names are just gameplay mechanics. The actual powers aren't as clearly defined as that - Kwenn 19:27, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
      • I agree it's questionably canon, I just disagreed with (or misunderstood) the idea that all "Force Powers" are simply gameplay mechanics Linkman95 04:51, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

+Tidy up

  • Erm, could this be tidied up a bit to explain how Mace and Sidious could use Vader's Warth? I would do it myself but its late over here. Jasca Ducato 21:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC)


+Is this real or not

I still think this is simply gameplay mechanics, the move itself is more like a build up of kinetic energy being exherted through the ground. The name is just useless, as the article clearly states Palps and Mace can use it to, so why not Mace's wrath or Palp's wrath. It simply doesn't work, and either needs to be majorly changed, merged with Force TK or deleted. Jedi Dude 19:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

It could be renamed Force Wrath instead. user:Darth Vatrir

It sounds a bit like what Yun did when he first appeared in Dark Forces II. However, his attack only sent Kyle Katarn flying backwards?--Darth Oblivion 01:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)