Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/The Silver Castle

< Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. The article was redirected to List of fanon creations Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was Redirect to List of fanon creations. --Azizlight 21:46, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

The Silver Castle

Bad grammar, Google search returns nothing but an RPG site with fan stuff...I vote Delete. Thanos6

  • Delete. Close the drawbridge on this one. jSarek 13:04, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Oy. I just woke up and logged on, and I haven't had any caffeine yet. Bad grammar makes my brain hurt and fanon makes it worse. And this is the first thing I see in the "Recent Changes" list? Delete the page, and feed the person who posted it to the Sarlacc! —Darth Culator (talk) 13:22, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect to List of fanon creations, to prevent it from being created again. --Azizlight 13:47, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)
    • That list was a good idea. My usual reaction to fanon is to kill it, but I think this could be the default action for most VfDs from now on. Changing my vote to redirect the page, still need to kill the creator. —Darth Culator (talk) 14:29, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)
      • I'm not sure if we should do that for every single bit of fanon that comes our way, this one doesn't seem as popular as some of the rest. Thanos6 14:30, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)
        • Well I figure it's possible that if fanon exists anywhere on the internet, then there is a chance it may be mistaken as canon, and hence should be flagged as fanon here. But if someone just makes up some fanon to add it to Wookieepedia, then it will be deleted. --Azizlight 14:35, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect to List of fanon creations. -- Riffsyphon1024 16:49, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect as above. I'm going to put together a template for this to avoid these lengthy Vfds when a simple "Fanon. Redirect. Lock." will do it.--SparqMan 19:34, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)