This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete - Sikon [Talk] 06:31, 11 June 2006 (UTC).
The Moral of This Story
Keep
- Swdude 13:47, 7 June 2006 (UTC) (1st edit)
- User:62.171.198.7 13:52, 7 June 2006 (UTC) (1st edit, anon)
- Keep but improve KEJ 12:56, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- Jediexile 15:37, 7 June
Delete
- Kuralyov 15:41, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, although I wouldn't be opposed to listing it on the List of fan sites. This article as it stands now reeks of advertising StarNeptuneTalk to me! 15:48, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, mention in list of fan sites per StarNeptune. RMF 16:34, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- Check out the profile of the guy who wrote the article. He's one of the dudes from the site. Can you say vanity? Havac 21:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- Ditto. -- Riffsyphon1024 12:51, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 12:55, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- I wasn't going to bother voting on this one since it seemed to be an effectively unanimous vote. But since someone tried to interfere I now say bandwagon delete. -- Darth Culator 14:34, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Sikon [Talk] 06:31, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- A huge article on a completely non-notable fansite. Kuralyov 15:41, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- Whether its notable or not its still a Star Wars Fansite and it will keep growing and with the right support it might be notable. —Unsigned comment by 62.171.198.7 (talk • contribs)
- Our policy is that, if it's not notable, it does not get a page. Additionally, using sockpuppets (yes, I've had a CheckUser done on you, so I know they're both you) does not work, and the vote will be disallowed. Additionally, anons can not vote. —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 12:55, 7 June 2006 (UTC)