Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Template:User sw-5

< Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was Delete. Imp 17:26, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Template:user sw-5

As the originator of this concept, I object to the addition of a fifth level on a number of grounds. First of all, I don't think five levels are necessary for anything. Second, a "complete" understanding of SW is impossible. I think "encyclopedic" is as high a level as someone could realistically attain. Third...well, okay, I guess that pretty much covers it. CooperTFN 22:56, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Keep. Considering it does not harm the articles of Wookieepedia and is only used on user pages, there really isn't a need for it to be deleted. While some people put this up (I myself did as a joke), we all know that no one knows everything about the Star Wars Galaxy. Since it does not harm any actual articles, I believe that it can stay. Admiral J. Nebulax 23:04, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  2. Keep. Only on the grounds that I get to change the description of level 5 to "A Nathan Butler understanding of Star Wars." :P Adamwankenobi 23:25, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Delete

  1. CooperTFN 22:56, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  2. I think I've made it clear how I feel about waste of space here. --SparqMan 00:25, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  3. Azizlight 00:31, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  4. Not even George Lucas has complete knowledge of Star Wars...he forgot how old the Republic was, for pete's sake! 8) — Silly Dan 03:57, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  5. I agree that "encyclopedic" is more than high enough. -- Dark Spork 04:28, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  6. Delete. Nobody knows everything, not even Nathan Butler, Abel G. Peña, or Leland Chee. jSarek 06:27, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  7. Delete. Adamwankenobi 12:31, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  8. I don't care. It doesn't harm anything, but then again, it is pointless. Delete. Admiral J. Nebulax 00:33, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  9. Delete. Its stupid and egotistical to list oneself as having a complete understanding unless they were the previously mentioned people. -- Riffsyphon1024 04:27, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC) Even if they were those people. CooperTFN 02:02, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Comments

  • Adam, there really are people out there who know more than Nate Butler. CooperTFN 00:09, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • Wow. Adamwankenobi 00:10, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
      • Just to let everyone know, I don't care if it's deleted or not. Admiral J. Nebulax 00:44, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
        • Of course you don't. =p CooperTFN 00:46, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
        • Then why stall it's deletion? --SparqMan 03:52, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)