This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was Delete. StarNeptuneTalk to me! 10:42, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
TIE/gs Ground Support Fighter
Seems to be copied from this website, and therefore fanon and maybe a copyright violation. --Craven 20:59, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Keep
Delete
- Craven 20:59, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
- Darth OblivionComlink
21:11, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
- Ozzel 21:19, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
- Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks 21:22, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
- Cutch 21:28, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
- —Silly Dan (talk) 21:33, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. jSarek 06:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Imp 13:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- Its most likely fanon, a copyright violation, and its full of RPG stats, that mean little or nothing to those who don't play it.--Darth OblivionComlink
21:11, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
- FWIW, the old Imperial Sourcebook only mentioned TIE/ln starfighters, TIE/fc starfighters, and TIE/sa starfighters in the ground-based TIE wings. —Silly Dan (talk) 21:33, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.