This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge to each respective film article. - Sikon [Talk] 07:54, 5 August 2006 (UTC).
Star Wars Trilogy: Unaltered
Nominate and Abstain: since the 2006 release is a combination of the 2004 DVD release with a laserdisc->DVD translation of the release from the 1980s, I'm not sure if we need this. On the other hand, maybe we want to have an article on each trilogy release. If that's the case, though, is this the correct title? —Silly Dan (talk) 23:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Keep
- I think ths two-line note-like article is fine for the time being. KEJ 07:09, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Ozzel 00:47, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Other suggestions
- Simply Merge into each respective film article. AdamwankenobiTalk to me! My home. 00:50, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed Anakin Thomas 07:20, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Merge. -- Riffsyphon1024 07:39, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Merge and delete. -- Ozzel 23:13, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- Judging by the cover photos, this should be at "Limited Edition" rather than "Unaltered Edition" if we decide to keep. —Silly Dan (talk) 21:27, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- What it comes down to is this: do we list individual video releases for the films? We haven't in the past. I say we keep with what we have now: put any noteworthy video release info on the individual film pages. -- Ozzel 23:12, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Or to List of changes in Star Wars re-releases. On the other hand, The Star Wars Trilogy Special Edition is a separate article. —Silly Dan (talk) 23:19, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- What it comes down to is this: do we list individual video releases for the films? We haven't in the past. I say we keep with what we have now: put any noteworthy video release info on the individual film pages. -- Ozzel 23:12, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- User:Luis.carlos aguila has removed the VFD tag from the page twice now, despite being warned not to. I could add it again, but that would be the thrid time, even though technically not a revert. Pehaps someone else would like to take care of it? -- Ozzel 21:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)