This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep - Sikon [Talk] 05:26, 16 April 2006 (UTC).
Sith crystal
Synth-crystal talks almost as much. Let's either delete or merge them. Darth Kevinmhk 05:08, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Deletion / Merge
Keep
- —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 06:12, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, as per Jaymach's comments. RMF 06:29, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
- KeepKuralyov 19:54, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Comments
The synth-crystal article doesn't cover everything this one does (or at least didn't upon the time of my writing and updating of this article) and really should just link to this page rather than talking about the "Sith" crystals, as they are very different from ordinary synth-crystals. —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 06:13, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
- Originally, my point for proposing was: Sith crystals are and must be synth-crystals. Sith crystals are merely "Sith version synth-crystals". And the Sith crystals article does not provide that much new information. And while the Sith used Sith crystals, the Sith users were currently listed in synth-crystals page. Darth Kevinmhk 08:50, 31 March 2006 (UTC)