This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep - Sikon 03:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC).
Silentium's creators
Keep
- Cull Tremayne 07:41, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Charlii 07:56, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- MyNz 08:26, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Separate entity, separate article. Havac 22:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- KEJ 23:53, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Kuralyov 08:17, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- This is setting a bad precedent. Lots of things are unnamed but canonical…should we just do away with them all? I think not. Cutch 13:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Not only do they exist canonically, but we know stuff about them. There's no reason we shouldn't be covering them. jSarek 06:11, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- But what do we know about them? I'm not saying we do away with all mention of them--I'm merely saying I don't think the meager information we have merits an entire article when the coverage exists elsewhere (the main Silentium article).Valin Kenobi 07:55, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
- See comment below.--Valin Kenobi 07:34, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- It does seem fairly redundant. -- Darth Culator (Talk)(TINC) 12:13, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Does this really need to exist? It appears to simply duplicate coverage from the Silentium entry, and in the absence of a name for the species, a separate article seems pointless.--Valin Kenobi 04:52, 31 October 2006 (UTC)--Valin Kenobi 07:34, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Really hard to decide here. They are a separate entity, so it would seem that they deserve their own article regardless of how little we know of them, though I understand where you're coming from. Cull Tremayne 07:41, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- They are a separate entity so keep this article. Also, this article was my work and you better consult me. MyNz 8:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC)