Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Shadow jedi

< Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was Redirect. --MarcK [talk]

Shadow jedi

Do we need this? -- Riffsyphon1024 11:10, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

  • Purge. Non-notable, poorly written. If I had stumbled across this article, I'd probably have marked it as speedy. - Sikon [Talk] 11:54, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Jedi Shadow. The article itself is fanon, but it's handy as a redirect. -Jaymach Ral'Tir 11:58, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)
    • It would be redirect-worthy if it was "Jedi" instead of "jedi". - Sikon [Talk] 12:07, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)
    • Since when does that matter. I could type "jEdI" or "DaRtH vAdEr" into the search bar and the results would not be effected. I say it's good as a redirct. -- AdmThrawn --
  • I agree. Redirect to Jedi Shadow. -- SFH 18:01, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect. Thrawn is right, the capitalization would matter if any page linked there, but none does, so only serves for the search box. --Thinortolan 23:17, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect

It is not really fanon as it is commonly accepted by many. Perhaps a bit better written yes, by me of course.