Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Order of the Sith

< Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was Redirect. WhiteBoy 09:38, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Order of the Sith

I hardly think this is notable enough for its own article. QuentinGeorge 05:12, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Though I like the fact that he called himself "Freedon," deedleat. --MarcK [talk] 05:18, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • freedon = DELETED! I'd say redirect to Sith, but it would probably be a useless redirect. - Sikon [Talk] 05:23, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Sith. That is what it was originally. -- SFH 05:38, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • If they were an active group with a website, they could be added to List of fan sites, but the article before blanking implied that they aren't anymore. Either way, this should Redirect to Sith. — Silly Dan 19:00, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect to sith. --SparqMan 02:32, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep as minimal article with a link to sith KEJ 16:07, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Comments

Why a minimal article

    • Why? - Sikon [Talk] 17:18, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)
      • Do I have to argue for it? Isn't my vote enough? You wanna ask everybody who votes without arguing for it 'why'? Doesn't matter if they exist anymore or not. They did exist (and they were the clan that lasted the longest - that must mean that they were an important part of the Star Wars gaminig community at that time), so why not a minimal article (like one line or something)? KEJ 15:00, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
        • Because there are no known precedents. Where have you seen a small one-liner instead of a redirect? - Sikon [Talk] 15:45, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
          • I was thinking of the gaming clan article, which is what is up for deletion - the sith reference would simply be an ordinary in text link. I've seen plenty of one liners around. (BTW I created a comments section, as I thought our little discussion here was starting to disturb the voting itself).KEJ 17:08, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)