This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Keep. -- Riffsyphon1024 01:29, 9 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Order D6-66
Unverifiable. Google test returns 8 pages if quoted, 555 if unquoted, but the only pages relevant to the subject are the SWW article and its derivatives. The page is orphaned. Should I say more? - Sikon 15:53, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: According to CUSWE, it is mentioned in Inside the Worlds of the Star Wars Trilogy. --Imp 15:59, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Interestingly enough, I have referenced that book and could not find it (yet). -- Riffsyphon1024 18:14, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, even as obscure as it is, it will not be removed if it exists in the Star Wars Universe, and is mentioned somewhere in literature. -- Riffsyphon1024 16:01, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep for reasons stated above --Imp 16:10, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, if only to prevent people from reading a reference to it and thinking they're talking about Order 66 and getting confused. -- Silly Dan 17:06, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, though it'd be nice to get the original source. By the way, what the Foxtrot is a time-lock device?--Eion 09:34, 2 Jul 2005 (UTC)
- Keep but edit. I found where it's mentioned in the OT ITW. It's on the bottom of page 13 (Mos Eisley) right next to the Route Key box, pointing to the docking bay with the Narcissus from Alien (an easter egg, one of several on those two pages) that's right below story point six on the map. Anyway, whoever created this page got it wrong, because it actually says: "Imperial order D6-66 requires all hangers be equipped with time-lock devices". -- Spanky The Dolphin
- Thanks for locating that info Spanky. On that note, it proves that this a real thing and should remain. -- Riffsyphon1024 22:56, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)