This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete - Sikon [Talk] 05:27, 16 April 2006 (UTC).
Masab Jirema
No results in CUSWE, no Google hits, no matches in the RPG Index. RMF 00:26, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Delete
- --Bobafett122005 00:32, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Sikon [Talk] 19:19, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
- MandalorianWarriortalk
19:27, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Keep
Comments
- I really don't think we should put Fanon articles on VFD, if we do that, that the VFD list will become very long. Fanon should just be tagged for speedy deletion (unless i'm mistaken, that's what the speedy tags were made for in the first place) The Admins have always deleted fanon without bothering with VFDs
- See Forum:Attempt to clarify template usage. RMF 02:40, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I can't say VFD length is a problem now, especially compared to Wikipedia and Uncyclopedia. I may come up with another method of treating sourceless fanon, besides speedily deleting obvious fanon and sending less obvious to VFD (which is essentially verification), but for now, that's all we have. - Sikon [Talk] 03:57, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Obvious fanon? such as: Jade Shikan? (which also has a VFD on it) That particular article should just be speedied, if you ask me...70.109.226.141 21:03, 6 April 2006 (PDT)
- Well, I can't say VFD length is a problem now, especially compared to Wikipedia and Uncyclopedia. I may come up with another method of treating sourceless fanon, besides speedily deleting obvious fanon and sending less obvious to VFD (which is essentially verification), but for now, that's all we have. - Sikon [Talk] 03:57, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- See Forum:Attempt to clarify template usage. RMF 02:40, 7 April 2006 (UTC)