This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep - Sikon [Talk] 09:42, 21 April 2006 (UTC).
Mandalorian Disintegrator
Needed? Relevant? - Sikon [Talk] 00:41, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Keep
- Keep. I haven't played KOTOR 2, but why wouldn't a canon weapon model deserve an article? How is this any different from a DL-44 or a Mandalorian Ripper?-LtNOWIS 03:24, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Why delete it? -- Ozzel 03:35, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. I see no reason whatsoever to delete this, it's a perfrctly valid page. 95 Headhunter
- Deffinately keep....I plan on adding all the KOTOR and KOTOR2 weapons/armour/etc. once I'm done with my ambig stuff. —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 21:28, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. It's canon.
- Keep not if his single vote changed on anything, as of the current state of the vote - TopAce 13:12, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Why delete canonical stuff? KEJ 13:12, 16 April 2006 (UTC)