Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Local Dig

< Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was keep - Sikon [Talk] 09:28, 28 June 2006 (UTC).

Contents

  • 1 Local Dig
    • 1.1 Delete
    • 1.2 Keep
    • 1.3 Comments

Local Dig

Delete

  1. Nowhere was the Polis Massa excavational project referred intergalactically simply as the "Local Dig". Also, there is barely any information on this. The information stated can be found in the article Polis Massa. Lucas Wolfdog 02:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Also, this article, if not simply merged with Polis Massa, could be merged with Archaeological Research Council (which is also very scarce in information) Lucas Wolfdog 15:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
      • Even a better article to merge with is "Polis Massa Base"

Keep

  1. Speedy Keep, see comments. RMF 02:45, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  2. As per RMF —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 02:48, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  3. AdamwankenobiTalk to me! My home. 02:48, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  4. Keep. It's canon. See Star Wars: Complete Locations. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 13:53, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  5. I say merge with Polis Massa. Sato Stars 15:42, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  6. Keep. No need for a merge. There is enough info for a spearate article - Kwenn 15:45, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  7. Keep, since it exists as a proper noun in two distinct sources. -- Darth Culator 18:09, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  8. KEEEEEEP, and check sources before nominating next time. KEJ 09:29, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  9. Keep. Bonko 22:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments

From the databank: "One of the largest topside facilities is called the Local Dig, and it is situated above the remains of Wiyentaah, an Eellayin city that the Polis Massans are meticulously uncovering." Seems clear enough. RMF 02:45, 23 June 2006 (UTC)


Please help state more reasons to keep if you wish to do so. The main article is literally two sentences long. If a topic has such little information, there must be a very strong arguement to keep it. Lucas Wolfdog 22:15, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

  • To User:Kwenn, where is all this info you speak of?
  • To User:Kej, I do wish to delete this article because of sources and I'm sorry if I made it seem like that's what I meant. I am simply trying to help clean out miniscule, practically irrelevant articles