This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus - Sikon [Talk] 06:00, 24 April 2006 (UTC).
Contents
Lava crystal
Itemcruft. - Sikon [Talk] 17:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Keep
I have changed it slightly so it could be a little more acceptable. Whoever did it first wrote things without proof. It is not the most powerful crystal just in SWG and you can't call that a source for judgement on power. But I have changed it to states The Lava Crystal was a lightsaber crystal that could only be found on volcanic planets and moons such as Mustafar. It generated a blade that resembled lava hence the name. This rare crystal was rumored to be very powerful. I hope you will find that acceptable. Swerto 13:58, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
I edited it, too. Keep it. It's still better than a lot of articles that we do not put up for deletion. - TopAce 14:02, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Keep and expand (and improve), if possible. KEJ 21:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- The question is, does this actually have a presence in the SW galaxy beyond gameplay mechanics?-LtNOWIS 17:33, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- There's a difference between gameplay mechanics like "Revan was a 20th level Jedi Guardian" or "Dewbacks had an ornriness code of 2D" and items from games which can count as canonical. This crystal seems to be as canonical as any other item in that game, or the various crystals in KOTOR (like the Sigil crystal or the Heart of the Force). —Silly Dan (talk) 17:47, 22 April 2006 (UTC)