This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep - Sikon [Talk] 08:05, 3 July 2006 (UTC).
Jedi brute
This is just a generic name given to an enemy bot in the ROTS game -- it's a little much to extrapolate an entire group of Jedi from that. Besides, why would the Jedi hae a bunch of people known as "Jedi Brutes". They'd at least be "Jedi Temple Guards" or something. It's more than a little silly.
Delete
- Havac 20:15, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- the Ash lad 20:34, 27 June 2006 (UTC) I don't think this warrants an in universe article, but has merit as an out of universe article. Of course, the same standard should be applied to the various other Jedi articles based on class distinctions from role-playing and video games that have never been acknowledged in universe.
- Randy Starkiller 20:43, 27 June 2006 (UTC) Agreement with the Ash lad.
Keep
- SFH 20:17, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Jedi Dude 21:37, 27 June 2006 (UTC) - this is a Jedi class and has canon basis, the deletion policy was put by a anon as well...
- Ozzel 21:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Durnar 21:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC) There are stupider game elements that have been kept in canon
- Purpilia 00:41, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- As much as games go against canon, new things in the games are still canon unless otherwise stated in a canon source. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
00:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC) - Maybe put a {{conjecture}} template on it, if the actual name seems to be more game mechanics than an in-universe name. —Silly Dan (talk) 00:57, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep with the real name. The game's name is canon. --SparqMan 19:04, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
