This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.—Silly Dan (talk) 00:56, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Contents
Imperial Corellian ship (talk - history - links - logs)
Keep
- Kuralyov 07:03, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
12:11, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- For completeness, even if it is probably destined to either be vague or be merged with another article at some point. —Silly Dan (talk) 05:44, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Atarumaster88
(Audience Chamber) 05:52, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Borderline, but there's just enough here to keep it from being a stub.--Valin Kenobi 07:18, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- If it exists, it exists. Havac 07:28, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, we should keep this. Although we should probably add something like "It's possible Han was just making conversation" to BtS. -LtNOWIS 07:35, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Merge
Redirect
Delete
Comments
- Imperials have been known to use Assassin-class corvettes and CR90s, so I see no use for this. .... 06:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- I suspect you're right that he was referring to a ship we've already seen. But the question is: which ship? Without anything substantive to go on, we just get into the realm of speculation.--Valin Kenobi 08:43, 27 January 2007 (UTC)