This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was rename - Sikon [Talk] 17:41, 21 March 2006 (UTC).
Contents
Haroot
This thing is named after a onomatopoeia. Argh. --Imp 17:23, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Votes
Delete
- Delete --Imp 17:23, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete if only an assumption. And are there two kind of bird? A Haroot and a Harooot? KEJ 17:27, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Keep
- It exists, it just hasn't been named. It's no less canonical than Unknown tridactyl species. It should be renamed to something more encyclopedic, though, like Unnamed Seylottan avian —Darth Culator (talk) 18:04, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed. It's a canon species, so keep and rename. -- SFH 19:28, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Rename per Darth Culator. While we're at it, rename Shlapt-shlurp and Bzzzzmmm. This is no different than most of Category:Articles that are conjecture. -LtNOWIS 21:35, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- There's nothing wrong with naming a species after its call. This is quite common on Earth (ie, killdeer, whip-poor-will) and in SW Galaxy (ie, neek). Although Seylott avian could be an ok name.JustinGann 11:23, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Rename. There's nothing wrong with naming an animal onomatopoetically, but we're not naming them; we're giving them informative provisional designations until *someone else* names them. Additionally, "haroot" is far more likely to be bandied about as fanon by those who don't pay attention to tags or behind the scenes sections than "Unnamed Seylott avian" or "Seylott avian." jSarek 11:49, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- rename P.h 04:49, 28 January 2006 (UTC)p.h