This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep - Sikon [Talk] 17:46, 2 April 2006 (UTC).
Force nexus
Sourceless for 2 weeks and I doubt we can dig any sources, because it seems to be a fan term. I considered slapping a conjecture tag, but perhaps VFD is more appropriate in this situation. - Sikon [Talk] 07:15, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- I think its from the clone wars video game. Like he big thing at the end, then again, maybe not.Evan The Great 21:15, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- This could be a variation of the Force wellspring that was built atop the Jedi Temple on Coruscant, and was rediscovered after the Fall of Coruscant by Irek Ismaren. -- SFH 21:22, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- The problem is that it's a term used colliquially by authors in canon, in statements like "Korriban was a nexus of the Dark Side" (no that doesn't come from a specific source), but the term hasn't been defined by any official publication. I say we keep it, but rewrite it as either a much shorter, simpler, grammatically correct entry, or as a clearly stated OOU one.--Erl 22:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC) (whoops, forgot name first time. heh-heh)
- Keep as per Erl's arguments. KEJ 15:14, 29 March 2006 (UTC)