This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (nothing to merge) - Sikon [Talk] 14:05, 29 March 2006 (UTC).
Darth Maul's lightsaber
Nothing makes Maul's lightsaber more unique than any other double-bladed lightsaber. If there's any non-redundant information on it, it can be covered in the Maul article. - Lord Hydronium 05:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Votes
Delete
- Lord Hydronium 05:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete or merge. There is precedent for this. —Darth Culator (talk) 05:47, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Merge with Darth Maul, Double-bladed lightsaber--The Erl 00:54, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, sabercruft. - Sikon [Talk] 05:33, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Merge to Darth Maul. Adamwankenobi 21:24, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- I vote for simply deletion. The Maul article & double-bladed article cover enough information. Darth Kevinmhk 11:18, 27 March 2006 (UTC)