Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Dark Jedi Knight

< Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was Redirect to Dark Jedi. Imp 12:57, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Dark Jedi Knight

Delete

  1. Delete. Fanon. Bly1993 23:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Keep. I found it mentioned in Young Jedi Knights: Shadow Academy on page 79. This is the evidence:
"We have already found a powerful new leader, a great one but we also need our own group of Dark Jedi Knights, Imperial Jedi, who will cement our factions together and give us will to defeat the wicked and unlawful government of the New Republic and bring about the Second Imperium."
―{{{2}}}

MyNz 23:22, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Redirect

  1. Make into a Redirect to Dark Jedi. Not fanon exactly, but I don't think the term is used canonically, at least not enough to warrant a separate article. — Silly Dan 23:16, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  2. Redirect. Agreed. It'd make a great redirect to Dark Jedi. --AdmThrawn 23:25, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Redirect to Dark Jedi. -- SFH 23:58, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Redirect to Dark Jedi. Though used canonically at least occasionally (see MyNz's note above), I don't believe a distinction is drawn between the two terms in any way. jSarek 01:14, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. redirect P.h 04:50, 28 January 2006 (UTC)p.h
  6. Redirect per jSarek. -LtNOWIS 05:14, 2 February 2006 (UTC)