Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Chosen One (Lannik)

< Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was Keep. --MarcK [talk]

Chosen One (Lannik)

Keep

  • Very weak keep -- Lannik links to this page, and has not been edited by anyone suspicious. I have replaced the lame nonsense that used to be in the article with a superior class of nonsense, however. — Silly Dan 17:45, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Also, if anyone objects to the vandal's racist and homophobic garbage being left in the edit history, an admin should delete and rewrite it. — Silly Dan 17:49, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
      • Is there such as thing as speedy keep? Because I think we could do that now. — Silly Dan 12:56, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I changed my vote. I didn't think to check the "What links here" button, so I didn't know it was actually something suggested by the Lannik page. I figured this was just a vulgar, independent nonsense article. SM-716 19:56, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Keep. I've expanded the page with new info - Kwenn 11:14, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, since the page has some real content now. --Tinwe 12:24, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep -Danik Kreldin 13:55, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Infolicious now. -- Riffsyphon1024 04:34, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Clearly now informative and relevant. jSarek

Comments

  • I deleted the original homophobic and racist version and restored Silly Dan's version, so that crap is no longer in the history of the article, should the community choose to keep it. StarNeptune 18:28, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Sounds fine to me... though the original version wasn't really homoPHOBIC. The dude seemed to be very much in favor of guy-on-guy action. Definitely racist, though. SM-716 19:56, 30 January 2006 (UTC)