Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Centurious

< Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete - Sikon 03:19, 10 November 2006 (UTC).

Centurious

Keep

  1. I am pretty sure the source is Dark Empire Sourcebook.JustinGann 14:40, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Delete

  1. --Valin Kenobi 07:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. Looks like fanon to me. Adamwankenobi 11:03, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  3. Delete unless sourced. jSarek 11:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  4. Imp 11:40, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  5. Cutch 13:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  6. Bub 23:05, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments

  • Can someone who actually has the DE Sourcebook look this up before anyone deletes anything? Kuralyov 22:06, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
    • I have it in my lap right now. While I haven't read the DESB cover to cover, I don't offhand recall seeing Centurious in it (or anywhere else for that matter). There's a section on Byss, the Deep Core, the Imperial Security Net, et al--which seems the most likely spot--and I can't find it there. It's not under the Overview for the planets section. Give me a page or more specific reference and I'll do what I can. BTW, on Google, the only Star Wars related link for Centurious is the Wookieepedia article itself. And for what it's worth, apparently Centurious is a character from the Ghost Rider comics from Marvel. Sorry, everything about the article stub screams "fanon" to me.--Valin Kenobi 23:04, 8 November 2006 (UTC)