This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was Delete. Imp 19:02, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Attack on Kashyyyk
Really, idiotic to think this is canon, as it's a lego movie, and all of the info is on the Revenge of the Brick page anyway. --Xilentshadow900 20:06, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Votes
- Delete--Xilentshadow900 21:27, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Delete--Tam 21:31, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC). Including something like this is utter nonsense.
- Hold votes for now... well, is not a common vote or meta-vote or whatever :) The discussion on the article Talk Page reached a point were the next step seems to be asking directly Leland Chee. A dispute mark would be enough for now to warn readers about it is posibly non-canon and the article could be deleted in the future. Talking about marks, you forgot to put the {{vfd}}, Xilenshadow, but as I said, there should be no rush. --Thinortolan 14:22, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- KEEP. Hold on a second. Why should the canonicity of something determine whether it should be an article? Take Star Wars: Revelations, for example. Is it canon? No. Do we keep it? Yes. Why? Because it was a notable prodution. Why do we keep this? Because it was a notable production. Why do we keep Hip Hop Yoda video? Because it is a notable production. General Kenobi 07:03, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- The article itself treats it as if it was depicted in a Republic comic book or something. It's even included in the list of Clone Wars battles as if it's from a real source. This is ridiculous. If it is going to stay, it should be called and treated as what it is, not included as part of the official Clone Wars timeline. -- AdmThrawn --
- KEEP. Just because it is probably not canon doesn't mean we should delete it!--Bly1993 15:03, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Actually, this doesn't even deserve to be merged. Admiral J. Nebulax 15:05, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Forget the rules. Definately non-canon - Kwenn
- Oh yeah, sure, let's forget the rules! It's fun! Who's up for deleting Jar Jar Binks? I tell you what. I'll put an AFD tag on it, and all unfavorable articles, since we get to forget the rules. Fun, fun, fun! General Kenobi 02:11, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Hehe, calm down, sir! This will get deleted because we all assume it is N-canon. When/if Tasty Taste declares it to be otherwise, I promise to undelete it. --Imp 02:15, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- I don't have a problem with it being deleted. My point is that you can't just say "Well, that's not a cool subject, so it probably isn't canon, and thus should be deleted." I too assume that it is non-canon, but I still don't think we should compromise the rules that were already set. I am 100% certain Leland Chee will deem it non-canon. But, non-canonicity should never be assumed by us, unless it is blatantly contradictory or is non-official fan fiction. General Kenobi 02:19, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Your sense of Logic astounds me. Your judgement has come into question before, with the hip-hop Yoda. You can't assume that everything under the twin suns is automatically canon. is your common sense completely gone? This needs to be deleted, as It's already in the Revenge of the Brick page anyway.--Xilentshadow900 17:53, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- General Grievous is used as a TV antenna for God's sake, how can it possibly be canon? --MarcK [talk] 02:22, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Understandable, however, as I said, we can never assume the non-canonicity of something unless it is specifically non-official fan fiction or blatantly contradictory. And besides, Dooku and Grievous are good buddies; friends help each other. ;) General Kenobi 02:26, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- I don't have a problem with it being deleted. My point is that you can't just say "Well, that's not a cool subject, so it probably isn't canon, and thus should be deleted." I too assume that it is non-canon, but I still don't think we should compromise the rules that were already set. I am 100% certain Leland Chee will deem it non-canon. But, non-canonicity should never be assumed by us, unless it is blatantly contradictory or is non-official fan fiction. General Kenobi 02:19, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Hehe, calm down, sir! This will get deleted because we all assume it is N-canon. When/if Tasty Taste declares it to be otherwise, I promise to undelete it. --Imp 02:15, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, sure, let's forget the rules! It's fun! Who's up for deleting Jar Jar Binks? I tell you what. I'll put an AFD tag on it, and all unfavorable articles, since we get to forget the rules. Fun, fun, fun! General Kenobi 02:11, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. No matter how notable a non-canon story is, there's no reason to create an article describing an event from that story. --MarcK [talk] 02:14, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per MarcK. -LtNOWIS 05:42, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)