This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was Delete. Imp 15:31, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
21,183 BBY
Only event mentioned here is conjecture from the non-canon Book of Imperial Shuttle Plans: Cygnus Spaceworks. Delete? — Silly Dan 22:27, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Not only that but its unneeded to have a year this random this far out. Delete. -- Riffsyphon1024 09:00, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Half the article consists of redlinks. Not very informative. - TheLastGunslinger 22:12, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Most of the years we have don't have much info on them anyway.--Xilentshadow900 20:08, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- But the actual info on this page is non-canon. -- Riffsyphon1024 11:14, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Now that the non-canon stuff has been excised, leaving the page basically empty, is there any need to keep it? Delete. - Lord Hydronium 08:29, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. --MarcK [talk] 11:32, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. RMF 01:58, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Until we have some info on it we could leave it blank. We have alot of year pages that are blank.-user:remoh
- But this one's pointless. Most of the blank ones (and I don't know why we need to have those either, for that matter) are at millennia, places where there is a chance of someone putting things (like the NEC, where exactly this was done). There's almost no chance of that here; it's simply a random year floating amidst literally thousands of others. - Lord Hydronium 00:58, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)