Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights/RFA archive/Darth Oblivion

< Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights | RFA archive
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Darth Oblivion (3 users/2 users + 2 admins + 1 bureaucrat/0)
    • 1.1 Support
    • 1.2 Oppose
    • 1.3 Neutral
    • 1.4 Comments

Darth Oblivion (3 users/2 users + 2 admins + 1 bureaucrat/0)

Two week deadline from first request, voting ends 15 March 2007.

Support

  1. Good user. Darthraul 03:36, 1 March 2007 (UTC)Darthraul
  2. Absolutely. --Yoshi626 03:37, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  3. Great user great friend, an admin for Gearspedia and I know he can do it. Darth tader(General) MandalorianKOTOR 03:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Sorry, but not now. Not at this time. Havac 03:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  2. No offense, but I'm going to have to go with the "do we really need more admins?" option here. I'm also not sure he meets rule #5. —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 03:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Frankly, I don't know how well that stands up anymore. Back in the early days when everything was getting started, that was fine, but now there aren't really any major articles left to create, and it's hardly any new user's fault that they haven't been able to do so. Havac 04:46, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  3. Riffsyphon1024 04:48, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  4. Sorry, but I'm going with the "too many admins" as well :/ —Xwing328(Talk) 04:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  5. Cull Tremayne 05:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC) -- I must agree with Jaymach.
  6. BubTalk 04:52, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  7. Not to say that he isn't a good user but...no. RedemptionRedemptionusersymbolTalk 05:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. I know it's useless commenting here, but despite him being a very good user, he is being nominated for the wrong reasons. I think. That's why my opinion is here. .... 06:20, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Has he accepted this nomination? --Yoshi626 03:38, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Don't worry. I have.--Lord OblivionSith holocronSith Emblem 03:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
    • OK. Cool. --Yoshi626 03:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
      • I must admit that 4dot has a point, and I suppose we do have a sufficient number of admins already. Would Riff's vote be the final nail in in the coffin?--Lord OblivionSith holocronSith Emblem 06:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
        • I suppose it is. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 15:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
          • Mark my words, I will have power one day, and I'll take my revenge on all who opposed me. Ha ha ha. :P Anyway, I'm not sure if it is OK to delete this now.--Lord OblivionSith holocronSith Emblem 17:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
            • It can be moved to the archive, if you want. Sometimes people just leave vetoed RFAs up here to gauge community reaction anyway. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 17:16, 1 March 2007 (UTC)