Wookieepedia:Re-featured article nominations/Naga Sadow

< Wookieepedia:Re-featured article nominations

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a re-featured article nomination that was unsuccessful'. Please do not modify it.</nowiki>

Naga Sadow

  • Originally nominated by: MarcK
  • Last featured on: May 7, 2006
  • Changes since last review: diff
  • Date placed on this page: May 15, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

  1. Tm
    • There's occasional speculation, like "Precisely what he said at that point is unknown, though it apparently won over many of those present."
    • And I couldn't find any mention about how he treated his massassi and all that relationship.
    • I'm willing to give this some work but I'm going to need review help. –Tm_T (Talk) 06:33, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
      • I'll help you, Tm. Just let me know what you need.—Tommy 9281 Friday, July 8, 2011, 02:36 UTC
    • I'm bit lost with the succession box year, as the comics gives year 4,990 BBY for The Fall of the Sith Empire storyarc, should this be taken as 5000 BBY as I assume? Does this need some footnote? –Tm_T (Talk) 21:47, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
      • It's 5,000 BBY per an overwhelming number of more recent sources (NEC is usually the safest bet for referencing). Not sure about a footnote, but I'd say probably not necessary. Menkooroo 14:11, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
        • No footnote required, always ignore the 4,990 BBY year with regard to these events. Always.—Tommy 9281 Sunday, July 10, 2011, 14:14 UTC
          • Ye, it's clearly wrong, just wasn't sure if it should be noted, thanks. (: –Tm_T (Talk) 14:16, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
    • To me it looks like the whole timeline of Great Hyperspace War within this article needs to be rewritten as how it is now described just doesn't fit with the information from Lost Tribe of the Sith ebooks. And thus, should this be removed from here and be moved to redux? Or simply dropped the status and renominate when the work is done? –Tm_T (Talk) 14:53, September 3, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • Just letting all know that I've been busy with other stuff so haven't got chance to delve into the sources this need. I should have the time in a week or so. –Tm_T (Talk) 07:48, August 10, 2011 (UTC)