21:57:02<@Toprawa> Ok, we'll begin with articles from last meeting
21:57:06<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Roark_Garnet
21:57:11<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Inq/Roark_Garnet
21:57:15<@Toprawa> This has been extended twice now
21:58:02<@ecks> why was it extended the last time?
21:58:03<@Toprawa> The date references were the issue
21:58:09<@Toprawa> More detailed referenced should be used for the WEG dates as those sources did not use BBY/ABY dates.
21:58:09<@Toprawa> Detailed references for all BBY/ABY dates added
21:58:09<@Toprawa> More work needs to be done on the date referencing. Please see log for details. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 15:16, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
21:58:09<@Toprawa> Added suggested additions to date references. - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 14:17, December 13, 2017 (UTC)
21:58:20<@ecks> it appears it's fixed, then
21:58:21<@Toprawa> Examining his edits...
21:59:33<@Toprawa> You know, I think that's a pretty lazy effort at fixing it
21:59:42<@Toprawa> All he does is link to this template http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Template:YearMathGRS
21:59:54<@Toprawa> Which doesn't really say anything at all about the specific GrS date in this article
22:00:09<@exiledjedi> Yeah.
22:00:29<@Toprawa> He's basically expecting the reader to read this convoluted template explanation and then make their own calculations on how this GrS date applies 10 ABY
22:00:34<@Toprawa> That's what he should explain
22:01:26<@exiledjedi> Yeah, allowing that would set a bad precedent.
22:02:00<@Toprawa> Well, I'm willing to give him one more crack at it, on the concession that we may not have explained this perfectly in the last meeting
22:02:08<@exiledjedi> Same
22:02:09<@Toprawa> But I don't know how else we can make it clearer after this
22:02:20<@Toprawa> You need to explain precisely how 10 ABY equals this GrS date
22:02:28<@Toprawa> It doesn't have to be a long or convoluted explanation
22:02:34<@Toprawa> Keep it as a simple as you can
22:02:46<@Toprawa> Template:YearMathGRS is the basis for how we calculate this
22:02:54<@Toprawa> It should be referenced, but it's not the solution for this explanation
22:03:10<@Toprawa> Ok, I vote to extend
22:03:15<@exiledjedi> Extend
22:03:26<@ecks> extend
22:03:32<@Toprawa> Roark Garnet extended
22:03:41<@Toprawa> I'm not even linking, but Darth Nihilus is next
22:03:45<@Toprawa> Naru is requesting an extension
22:03:49<@Toprawa> Fine with me
22:04:03<@ecks> yep
22:04:03<@ecks> extend
22:04:06<@exiledjedi> Sure, extend
22:04:09<@Toprawa> Darth Nihilus extended
22:04:17<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Mount_Corvast
22:04:24<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Inq/Mount_Corvast
22:04:25<@Toprawa> No changes
22:04:36<@exiledjedi> Kill
22:04:39<@Toprawa> Kill
22:05:03<@Toprawa> ecks?
22:05:32<@ecks> kill
22:05:33<@ecks> sorry
22:05:36<@Toprawa> Mount Corvast killed
22:05:49<@Toprawa> One second...
22:05:51<@Toprawa> Checking something
22:06:15<@Toprawa> Stating this for the record:
22:06:27<@Toprawa> Since we legally need 4 Inqs to kill these articles, as we talked about last meeting
22:06:43<@Toprawa> Imperators' absentee vote is counting in all of these votes, unstated, as noted on the meeting page
22:06:49<@Toprawa> Moving on
22:06:57<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Coruscant_Security_Force
22:07:01<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Inq/Coruscant_Security_Force
22:07:07<@Toprawa> He got some of it
22:07:11<@Toprawa> Didn't get all of it
22:07:16<@Toprawa> I realize that not all objections have been met, however I'm still planning on addressing them. I would also note that it looks like there is possibly more material upcoming from the comic series that will need to be updated next month anyways. An extension on this review would be appreciated. Coruscantfan (Talk) 19:31, December 16, 2017 (UTC)
22:07:32<@Toprawa> Fine
22:07:35<@exiledjedi> Extend
22:07:39<@ecks> extend
22:07:42<@Toprawa> Coruscant Security Force extended
22:07:50<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Independence
22:07:54<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Inq/Independence_(second_review)
22:08:38<@ecks> Bts is still partly unsourced, I guess
22:08:41<@Toprawa> He didn't do all of it
22:08:45<@exiledjedi> He didn't update for what I was asked for either.
22:08:52<@Toprawa> If you asked him, I'm sure he would say he's relying on self-sourcing in the BTS
22:09:06<@exiledjedi> It identifies it as the wrong kind of cruiser.
22:09:10<@Toprawa> He didn't subsection the BTS
22:09:38<@ecks> can you elaborate, EJ?
22:09:37<@Toprawa> I realize we didn't make this an original point of probation, but can't we get any BTS images for this?
22:09:50<@Toprawa> No production shots of this ship being made or something?
22:10:30<@exiledjedi> It calls it an MC80a.
22:10:40<@exiledjedi> Which is a different type of ship.
22:10:52<@Toprawa> Forgive me, but did we include this in the original probation reasons?
22:10:55<@Toprawa> I don't see it listed
22:11:02<@exiledjedi> This was the update.
22:11:06<@Toprawa> Ok
22:11:07<@exiledjedi> For CSWE
22:11:33<@ecks> that wasn't really made clear
22:11:42<@Toprawa> I'm willing to give him another crack at it
22:11:45<@ecks> I am willing to grant an extension since some work was done
22:11:45<@Toprawa> At least he's working on it
22:11:55<@exiledjedi> Extend
22:12:02<@ecks> extend
22:12:05<@Toprawa> Note to GT, I'd recommend talking to either myself or EJ to make sure you're getting everything we're looking for
22:12:14<@Toprawa> Independence extended
22:12:23<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Imperial_Hyperspace_Security_Net
22:12:31<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Inq/Imperial_Hyperspace_Security_Net_(second_review)
22:12:34<@Toprawa> Nothing
22:12:39<@Toprawa> Kill
22:12:46<@exiledjedi> Kill
22:12:47<@ecks> Kill
22:12:52<@Toprawa> Imperial Hyperspace Security Net killed
22:12:56<@Toprawa> Moving on to new articles
22:13:00<@Toprawa> This is a note from Hanzo on the meeting page:
22:13:04<@Toprawa> The following RFANs were failed due to unresolved objections, and no review was ever formally done for these still-recognized FAs. I looked at each individually and saw that the listed objections still weren't addressed:
22:13:17<@ecks> my man
22:13:20<@Toprawa> He has several listed for Joram Kithe, which were from me apparently
22:13:24<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Joram_Kithe
22:13:26<@Toprawa> I won't post them all here
22:13:29<@Toprawa> Please see meeting page
22:14:16<@Toprawa> Infobox-exclusive info
22:14:45<@Toprawa> Probe if there's nothing else to add
22:14:51<@exiledjedi> Probe
22:15:11<@Toprawa> Hanzo should just be an Inq if he does this much work
22:15:24<@ecks> Probe
22:15:28<@Toprawa> Joram Kithe probed
22:15:31<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Ravager_(Centurion-class)
22:15:36<@Toprawa> Infobox exclusive info. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:04, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
22:15:38<@ecks> if he reviews some, I'm all for it :P
22:16:04<@Toprawa> The BTS kind of sucks
22:16:11<@exiledjedi> The 3951 BBY date cannot be sourced to the game.
22:16:16<@Toprawa> I'd say it needs to be "modernized"
22:16:22<@exiledjedi> Agreed.
22:16:23<@Toprawa> See the Layout Guide for details
22:16:28<@Toprawa> This is just trivial: Like the Leviathan, the appearance of the Ravager is similar to the Imperial-class Star Destroyers of the Star Wars films.[5][6][7][8]
22:16:42<@Toprawa> Probe
22:16:45<@ecks> seems unnecessary
22:16:46<@ecks> probe
22:16:47<@exiledjedi> Probe
22:16:51<@Toprawa> Ravager (Centurion-class) probed
22:16:59<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Tohno
22:17:03<@Toprawa> Infobox-exclusive dates, also inadequate sourcing of the BBY dates. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:04, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
22:17:19<@Toprawa> Some of those paragraphs could use breaks in Oasis
22:17:48<@Toprawa> Yeah, the 22 BBY date is sourced to AOTC
22:17:50<@exiledjedi> 22 BBY cannot be sourced directly to AOTC.
22:17:54<@Toprawa> heh
22:17:57<@Toprawa> Probe
22:18:07<@exiledjedi> Probe
22:18:13<@ecks> pronr
22:18:15<@ecks> er
22:18:15<@Toprawa> Tohno probed
22:18:20<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Red_Nebula
22:18:33<@Toprawa> Intro disproportionately shorter than rest of article, description missing infobox astrographical data. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:04, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
22:18:33<@Toprawa> 3 ABY citations made using a 1981 comic, 19 years before BBY/ABY was formally established. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 17:32, November 23, 2017 (UTC)
22:18:44<@Toprawa> All of these Marvel images could be improved via The Club
22:19:02<@Toprawa> This is article-quality rules
22:19:03<@Toprawa> I mean
22:19:06<@Toprawa> image-quality rules
22:19:39<@Toprawa> That Leland Chee message board ref needs to be found
22:19:46<@Toprawa> Someone had an archive of most of them somewhere
22:19:53<@Toprawa> Would take a fair amount of digging
22:20:10<@Toprawa> Anything else?
22:20:20<@Toprawa> Probe
22:20:23<@ecks> probe
22:20:24<@exiledjedi> Probe
22:20:29<@Toprawa> Red Nebula probed
22:20:37<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Monument_Plaza/Legends
22:20:43<@Toprawa> ISWU, a source, is tagged with (First appearance) in sources list, and appearances list doesn't feature same tag. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:11, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
22:20:43<@Toprawa> Addendum: "It is possible that Monument Plaza was used by the Vong to grow their organic war materiél" from History section sounds like speculation, unless the cited material literally says it.
22:20:43<@Toprawa> Kaldani Spires Residential Apartments mentioned solely in the infobox. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:34, December 4, 2017 (UTC)
22:21:36<@Toprawa> I don't support the ISWU thing as a formal objection
22:21:44* @ecks objects to image caption punctuation
22:21:47<@Toprawa> We're not perfectly consistent with that stuff
22:21:52<@Toprawa> And it's been our precedent to use it in Sources list
22:22:07<@Toprawa> Plus, the LG allows a concession for this in rare instances
22:22:16<@Toprawa> "Additionally, items in the Sources list typically should never use the (First appearance) tag, which is primarily used in the Appearances list."
22:22:29<@Toprawa> This is an atypical case where we actually do use it
22:22:38<@Toprawa> If we want to change that, I think it should go through a larger community discussion
22:22:42<@ecks> yeah, I was wondering about that
22:23:07<@Toprawa> I mean to say, that it's been our precedent to list ISWU in Sources
22:23:19<@Toprawa> But everything else
22:24:12<@Toprawa> There's a scene in TCW where they're in monument plaza
22:24:14<@exiledjedi> It could use some subsectioning.
22:24:15<@Toprawa> That's the main infobox image
22:24:21<@Toprawa> But there's more stuff that goes on that more images could be used
22:24:41<@Toprawa> There's an opportunity to show Satine and Obi-Wan together in Monument Plaza
22:25:04<@Toprawa> Probe
22:25:21<@exiledjedi> Probe
22:25:42<@Toprawa> Dates, if we didn't mention that
22:25:59<@Toprawa> Date references, I mean
22:26:17<@Toprawa> ecks?
22:26:19<@ecks> probe
22:26:45<@Toprawa> Monument Plaza/Legends probed
22:26:56<@Toprawa> starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Raich
22:27:00<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Raich
22:27:28<@ecks> these quote templates rustle my jimmies
22:27:29<@Toprawa> All instances of "Forest Moon of Endor" should be capitalized per source material
22:27:39<@Toprawa> Inadequate linking in infobox
22:27:45<@Toprawa> Infobox-exclusive info
22:27:53<@ecks> what's this referencing-appearances thing?
22:28:09<@Toprawa> Yeah...
22:28:12<@Toprawa> It's basically pure speculation
22:28:16<@ecks> this is an LG mess
22:28:16<@Toprawa> Read the second paragraph of the BTS
22:28:18<@exiledjedi> Yeah, that makes no sense.
22:28:22<@Toprawa> That's baloney
22:28:28<@Toprawa> That should all be removed
22:28:35<@Toprawa> There's no even indirectly stated connection
22:28:45<@Toprawa> I question how there's not a single date attached to this article
22:28:49<@Toprawa> We know the Ewoks series stuff takes place in 3 ABY
22:29:26<@Toprawa> Probe
22:29:33<@ecks> probe
22:29:40<@exiledjedi> Probe
22:29:51<@Toprawa> There was this from Hanzo too Raich -- Speculation in 1st paragraph of bio alone, also BTS speculation. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:11, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
22:29:55<@Toprawa> Raich probed
22:30:00<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Qrrrl_Toq
22:30:04<@Toprawa> Qrrrl Toq -- speculation in the article body ("Why Toq made the switch between weapons is unknown" in P&A), 3996 BBY death date infobox exclusive and cited to a comic published before the BBY system was established
22:30:32<@Toprawa> A little more subsectioning would be nice
22:30:35<@Toprawa> Particularly at the beginning
22:30:41<@Toprawa> I see redirects and redlinks
22:30:43<@Toprawa> General cleanup
22:30:58<@Toprawa> None of these TOTJ images are from The Club
22:31:16<@Toprawa> For reference, The Club basically means get high-quality digital versions of these comic images, per image-quality rules
22:31:40<@ecks> is our policy not that intact speech bubbles must have their text intact as well?
22:31:53<@Toprawa> I forget in that case
22:32:18<@Toprawa> Fix DB template formatting
22:32:34<@ecks> this linking is just horrible
22:32:48<@Toprawa> "Speech bubbles should ideally be cropped out of an image. If it is not possible to crop them out, the text in the bubbles should be left in if the bubble is intact. If the bubble is cut off, the text should be removed. "
22:32:50<@ecks> what's with the DB template?
22:33:04<@Toprawa> DB template names need to be listed by last name first
22:33:09<@Toprawa> That's how the DB formatted their entries
22:33:17<@Toprawa> But no one ever followed this for some reason
22:33:20<@Toprawa> Maybe we're all just dyslexic
22:33:43<@Toprawa> I'm satisfied this is enough to kill it
22:33:44<@Toprawa> Probe
22:33:50<@exiledjedi> Probe
22:33:58<@ecks> I must be missing something there. I see one DB template, with the correct title displayed
22:34:07<@Toprawa> Oh, it is
22:34:08<@Toprawa> My mistake
22:34:16<@ecks> for some dumb reason, this particular entry is Last name, first name
22:34:17<@ecks> Probe
22:34:23<@Toprawa> Funny
22:34:27<@Toprawa> Qrrrl Toq probed
22:34:35<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Noval_Garaint
22:34:40<@Toprawa> Noval Garaint -- speculation in body (P&T mentioning "for reasons unknown"), infobox-exclusive info
22:35:14<@Toprawa> This is completely unnecessary to add and explain Alternatively, throughout a player's campaign, all minor characters have a chance (chosen randomly by the game engine) to become Force-sensitive and thus trained by either Luke Skywalker or Darth Vader. If Noval Garaint is selected to be Force-sensitive, then his character could be trained in the ways of the Force by Vader. Garaint's Force-sensitivity, however, is
22:35:15<@Toprawa> non-canonical as it is decided purely by chance, and should not be confused with canon.[2]
22:35:15<@exiledjedi> Redirects
22:35:26<@Toprawa> That could be mentioned in every single Rebellion character article, which we definitely haven't been doing
22:35:47<@Toprawa> I would, however, strongly suggest looking at the game's strategy guide, which gives tips on how each character can best be used in the game; i.e., sabotage missions
22:35:51<@Toprawa> That should definitely be included
22:36:07<@Toprawa> This, too, is basically nonsense general summary: "In the game, the player could use Garaint for a wide variety of missions ranging from abduction of enemy characters, to the assassination of Rebels, to the sabotage of enemy facilities."
22:36:11<@Toprawa> That applies to everyone
22:36:19<@Toprawa> There should be specific character strengths for Noval Garaint
22:36:40<@Toprawa> We can be more specific with our ABY dates
22:36:48<@Toprawa> Rebellion begins the day after the Battle of Yavin
22:37:06<@ecks> Probe
22:37:08<@Toprawa> I know those Galaxy Guides gave general dates too
22:37:12<@Toprawa> Probe
22:37:17<@exiledjedi> Probe
22:37:23<@Toprawa> Noval Garaint probed
22:37:36<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Finhead_Stonebone
22:37:46<@Toprawa> Finhead Stonebone -- "unknown insectoid species," BBY date sourced to same comic series as Qrrrl Toq above which predate 1st usage of that dating system
22:37:58<@Toprawa> Images should be digital
22:38:00<@Toprawa> I see redirects
22:38:24<@Toprawa> Could probably use better subsectioning
22:38:38<@ecks> no quote for the first bio section?
22:38:39<@Toprawa> Infobox-exclusive info
22:39:00<@Toprawa> Probe
22:39:03<@ecks> Probe
22:39:24<@exiledjedi> Probe
22:39:38<@Toprawa> Finhead Stonebone probed
22:39:48<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Bouncer
22:39:53<@Toprawa> Bouncer -- infobox exclusive info, verify the ABY date citations. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:41, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
22:40:12<@ecks> Can we give Hanzo Emergency Powers to probe everything he wants to?
22:40:27<@Toprawa> What Hanzo is saying is that 4 ABY can't be sourced to those Dark Forces sources
22:40:42<@ecks> reference 8 is a bit...
22:40:43<@exiledjedi> What is reference 8 doing?
22:41:10<@Toprawa> Yeah, let's give possible timeline references from some fan site
22:41:16<@Toprawa> That's the Wookieepedia Way
22:41:50<@Toprawa> Probe
22:42:04<@ecks> probe
22:42:17<@exiledjedi> I'd question how reference 11 is being used as well.
22:42:23<@exiledjedi> Probe
22:42:49<@Toprawa> Bouncer probed
22:42:54<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Vors_Voorhorian
22:43:02<@Toprawa> The images are pretty good for scanning
22:43:03<@Toprawa> I'll give them that
22:43:11<@Toprawa> But I do believe there are digital versions available
22:43:18<@Toprawa> These Star Wars Kids comics were recollected in an Omnibus
22:43:32<@Toprawa> Vors Voorhorian -- infobox exclusive info, speculation ("it is possible that Voorhorian was freed" in bio cited to a dead forum link). Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:29, November 29, 2017 (UTC)
22:43:46<@ecks> ref 4 needs dat cite web
22:44:18<@Toprawa> Ref 1 needs the template
22:44:21<@exiledjedi> he X-wing would go on to be a mainstay in the Alliance fleet, and would even serve the New Republic consistently.
22:44:33<@exiledjedi> I'm sure we can reference that to a single source instead of three.
22:44:54<@Toprawa> Agreed
22:44:57<@Toprawa> Linking in infobox
22:45:03<@Toprawa> Infobox-exclusive info
22:45:07<@Toprawa> Hanzo said that
22:45:09<@Toprawa> Probe
22:45:24<@ecks> probe
22:45:23<@exiledjedi> Probe
22:45:32<@Toprawa> Vors Voorhorian probed
22:45:46<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Crado
22:45:51<@Toprawa> Crado -- infobox exclusive info, death year also only in infobox but not in biography. Equipment section also needed.
22:46:28<@Toprawa> These are really nice scans, but I'm pretty sure they're not digital, since Redemption uploaded them
22:46:39<@exiledjedi> Redlink, redirects
22:46:49<@Toprawa> Paragraph breaks needed
22:47:01<@ecks> I'm not willing to kill this just because the images are only 99% of what they could be :P
22:47:37<@Toprawa> Well, if there's a drastic difference between the sharpness of these and digital, that's an issue
22:47:47<@Toprawa> I don't know how different they are without comparing them side by side
22:47:57<@Toprawa> At the very least, someone should look at that
22:48:11<@ecks> sorry guys, have to step out for a few mins, Tope has my vote
22:48:22<@Toprawa> I'm just saying they're very nice for physical scans
22:48:27<@Toprawa> Redemption was always the best at that
22:48:44<@Toprawa> This is practically digital quality https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/starwars/images/6/6e/X_cathar4.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20081206170243
22:49:06<@Toprawa> Cade's infobox code makes it look like it's digital
22:49:13<@Toprawa> But you can kind of see the difference in the other ones
22:49:15<@Toprawa> Anyways, moving on
22:49:16<@Toprawa> Probe
22:49:18<@exiledjedi> Probe
22:49:23<@Toprawa> Crado probed
22:49:29<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Chrag%27mak%27al
22:49:34<@Toprawa> Chrag'mak'al -- infobox exclusive info, check the source material to see if "whether or not he was apprehended remains unknown" is actually mentioned. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:41, November 29, 2017 (UTC)
22:49:47<@Toprawa> "remains" doesn't work anyway
22:49:53<@Toprawa> We write in past tense on Wookieepedia
22:50:26<@Toprawa> "Talents and abilities" isn't a LG section
22:50:35<@Toprawa> And some of its contents should be in an Equipment section
22:50:48<@Toprawa> BTS has italics formatting issues
22:50:53<@exiledjedi> I'm betting it would be possible to give some kind of timeline placement in the body.
22:50:58<@Toprawa> Most likely
22:51:17<@Toprawa> Probe
22:51:22<@exiledjedi> Probe
22:51:25<@Toprawa> Chrag'mak'al probed
22:51:28<@exiledjedi> Just to let you know, I'm going to need to head off in about 5 minutes.
22:51:34<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Leektar/Legends
22:51:39<@Toprawa> Ok
22:51:44<@Toprawa> Equipment section needed
22:51:44<@Toprawa> Infobox exclusive info
22:51:44<@Toprawa> General context needed ("Leektar grew up in Red Bush Grove, a small community south of the more prominent Ewok settlement, Bright Tree Village" begins the biography for example)
22:51:44<@Toprawa> Date for Battle of Endor not mentioned. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:47, November 30, 2017 (UTC)
22:51:47<@ecks> ok, I'm back
22:52:01<@Toprawa> Redirects, general cleanup
22:52:04<@Toprawa> We'll try to move through this quickly
22:52:08<@Toprawa> There's only a few left
22:52:09<@Toprawa> Probe
22:52:13<@exiledjedi> Probe
22:52:37<@ecks> probe
22:52:40<@Toprawa> Leektar/Legends probed
22:52:43<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Croke
22:52:49<@Toprawa> Croke — this edit added information to the body of the article that should be reflected in the infobox, as well. It should also be checked whether the new information should be added elsewhere in the article, and whether the linking shouldn't be updated.
22:52:56<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Croke?curid=2429&diff=7291347&oldid=7291346
22:53:27<@Toprawa> Pretty sure all of that ABY/BBY referencing needs to be fixed
22:53:42<@Toprawa> Though I could be wrong
22:53:46<@Toprawa> It should be checked, though
22:53:59<@Toprawa> Probe
22:54:02<@ecks> probe
22:54:02<@exiledjedi> Probe
22:54:03<@Toprawa> Croke probed
22:54:14<@Toprawa> Hanzo says:
22:54:17<@Toprawa> These two edits by anonymous users should be checked for accuracy:
22:54:21<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Battle_of_Kamino/Legends
22:54:26<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/index.php?title=Battle_of_Kamino%2FLegends&diff=7293225&oldid=7221096
22:54:41<@Toprawa> Probe
22:54:52<@ecks> p
22:54:54<@exiledjedi> Probe
22:54:55<@Toprawa> Battle of Kamino/Legends probed
22:54:58<@Toprawa> Same deal:
22:54:58<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Gara_Petothel
22:55:38<@ecks> p
22:55:50<@exiledjedi> Probe
22:56:13-!- Ralltiir (~Toprawa@wookieepedia/bureaucrat/Toprawa) has joined #wookieepedia-inquisitorius (acc: Toprawa)
22:56:14* ChanServ sets modes [#wookieepedia-inquisitorius +o Ralltiir]
22:56:16<@Ralltiir> Sorry
22:56:24<@Ralltiir> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Gara_Petothel
22:56:29<@Ralltiir> http://starwars.wikia.com/index.php?title=Gara_Petothel&diff=7294013&oldid=7287159
22:56:39<@Ralltiir> Probe
22:56:41<@exiledjedi> Probe
22:56:46<@ecks> probe
22:56:45<@Ralltiir> Gara Petothel probed
22:56:51<@Ralltiir> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Sun_Guard
22:56:54<@Ralltiir> Sun Guard — this should be checked, and, if true, formatted. Imperators II(Talk) 21:21, December 14, 2017 (UTC)
22:56:59<@Ralltiir> This: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Sun_Guard?curid=83880&diff=7300738&oldid=7252954
22:57:02<@Ralltiir> Probe
22:57:15<@exiledjedi> Redlink, as well.
22:57:16<@exiledjedi> Probe
22:57:31<@ecks> p
22:57:32<@Ralltiir> Sun Guard probed
22:57:40<@Ralltiir> We will not be looking at the Maintenance Bin this meeting
22:57:52<@Ralltiir> And I didn't have time to formulate my discussion item
22:57:57<@Ralltiir> Meeting duties...
22:57:57<@exiledjedi> That thing is overflowing.
22:58:06<@Ralltiir> Do you want to look at it?
22:58:10<@Ralltiir> I was just skipping it since you have to go
22:58:14<@exiledjedi> Not now.
22:58:17<@Ralltiir> Ok
22:58:19<@ecks> please don't be me on paperwork
22:58:20<@Ralltiir> Meeting duties...
22:58:39<@Ralltiir> Paperwork - SE
22:58:47<@Ralltiir> Scheduling 87 - ecks
22:58:48<@ecks> awww yis
22:58:50<@exiledjedi> RIP SE
22:58:54<@Ralltiir> Meeting 86 is concluded
22:58:56<@exiledjedi> See you later.
22:58:57<@Ralltiir> Thanks for coming
22:59:00<@ecks> excellent