[09:04] <Cylka> Welcome to meeting 37.
[09:04] <Cylka> First up: probed articles from last time.
[09:05] <Cylka> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Undercity_sewers
[09:05] <Cylka> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Inq/Undercity_sewers
[09:06] <Darth_Burger> The issue is that whoever is working on it wants a second probation extension
[09:06] <Cylka> I'm divided on this one as some work has been done. The biggest problem is that no one has access to the game right now and can't check alternate choices.
[09:07] <Cylka> Absentees 3 probe, 3 kill
[09:07] <Cylka> So it's up to us.
[09:07] <IFYLOFD> Kill.
[09:07] <Darth_Burger> We don't even know /when/ someone might have access to the material to fix it satisfactorily
[09:07] <Darth_Burger> The article is so short, it could easily go through the review process again
[09:07] <Darth_Burger> I vote kill as well
[09:07] <Cylka> I won't until November or December.
[09:07] <grunny> Kill
[09:08] <Cylka> Ok, kill it is.
[09:08] <grunny> they can always re-FA it
[09:08] <Cylka> Exactly.
[09:08] <Cylka> Next:
[09:08] <Cylka> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Ric_Oli%C3%A9
[09:08] <Cylka> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Inq/Ric_Oli%C3%A9
[09:09] <Cylka> Absentees say kill.
[09:09] <Darth_Burger> No work has been done.
[09:09] <Darth_Burger> Kill.
[09:09] <IFYLOFD> This is a vote to kill the FA status of Ric Olie's article on Wookieepedia.
[09:10] <grunny> kill
[09:10] <grunny> haha
[09:10] <Cylka> Kill.
[09:10] <Cylka> Ok, we'll kill Ric. :P
[09:11] <Cylka> Next:
[09:11] <Cylka> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Platt_Okeefe
[09:11] <Darth_Burger> I have a question for Platt I'm not even sure anyone here can answer.
[09:11] <Cylka> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Inq/Platt_Okeefe
[09:11] <Darth_Burger> From what I've read on the meeting page, the issue seems to be whether all of the Atlas info has been added.
[09:11] <Darth_Burger> Which has not been addressed on the review page.
[09:11] <Darth_Burger> Apparently "some" Atlas stuff has been added.
[09:12] <Cylka> And everyone on the meeting page has some kind of issue with the article.
[09:12] <Cylka> LG, heading name
[09:12] <Darth_Burger> Basically because whoever handled the maintenance of the article neglected this Atlas point
[09:12] <Cylka> But, also everyone says keep or weak keep.
[09:13] <Cylka> Maybe extend probe?
[09:13] <Darth_Burger> I agree - extend probe so the Atlas issue is addressed
[09:13] <Cylka> Since some work has been done, but not all.
[09:13] <IFYLOFD> Extend, I guess.
[09:13] <grunny> extend probe then
[09:14] <Cylka> Extend probe it is.
[09:14] <Cylka> That is all for probed articles. Now on to new articles up for review.
[09:15] <Cylka> Unless anyone wants to add something to Platt Okeefe?
[09:15] <Cylka> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Halagad_Ventor
[09:15] <Cylka> Underlinking, and could possibly use a small intro expansion. -- 1358 (Talk) 07:28, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
[09:16] <grunny> underlinking really isn't a probe-worthy issue
[09:16] <IFYLOFD> Yeah, this seems kinda weak.
[09:16] <grunny> Fiolli's right, that's basically {{sofixit}}
[09:16] <Darth_Burger> I agree with Fioll's comment: "# Halagad Ventor: Weak probe. At this stage, I think the "underlinking issue" probably qualifies as {{Sofixit}}. "
[09:16] <Darth_Burger> Fiolli*
[09:16] <Cylka> Yes, the others said probe.
[09:16] <IFYLOFD> The intro could definitely be expanded though.
[09:16] <IFYLOFD> Probe.
[09:17] <Cylka> So that is 5 for probe.
[09:17] <Darth_Crumpet> Indeed. Probe.
[09:17] <Darth_Burger> Probe
[09:17] <Cylka> Probe.
[09:17] <grunny> probe for intro expansion only
[09:17] <Cylka> OK, Ventor probed for intro.
[09:17] <grunny> linking is {{sofixit}}
[09:17] <Cylka> Next: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/XJ-6_airspeeder
[09:18] <Cylka> Needs general cleanup with sentence/paragraph structure and seems to be missing some sources, as well. (Pre-Inq FA, too.) — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 15:19, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
[09:18] <grunny> probe
[09:19] <Darth_Burger> probe
[09:19] <IFYLOFD> Probe.
[09:19] <Cylka> Probe.
[09:19] <Darth_Crumpet> Probe.
[09:19] <Cylka> Alright, XJ-6 is probed.
[09:19] <grunny> Cav appears :P
[09:19] <Cylka> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Myhr_Rho
[09:19] <Darth_Crumpet> Nap time is over :P
[09:20] <grunny> haha
[09:20] <Cylka> Update tag.
[09:20] <Darth_Burger> probe
[09:20] <grunny> Probify
[09:20] <Darth_Crumpet> Probe.
[09:20] <Cylka> Nice to see you Cav.
[09:20] <Cylka> Probe.
[09:20] <IFYLOFD> Probulate.
[09:20] <Cylka> Rho is probed.
[09:21] <Cylka> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Kopecz
[09:21] <Cylka> Tommy seems to have addressed this.
[09:21] <Cylka> There was a fact tag.
[09:21] <grunny> no probe
[09:21] <IFYLOFD> Keep.
[09:21] <Darth_Burger> No probe
[09:21] <Cylka> Spare
[09:21] <Darth_Crumpet> No probing.
[09:22] <Cylka> Kopecz is spared.
[09:22] <Cylka> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Bevel_Lemelisk
[09:22] <Cylka> —update needed from Starships and Vehicles 9.
[09:22] <IFYLOFD> Probe!
[09:23] <Darth_Burger> the update tag should be on there
[09:23] <Darth_Burger> but probe
[09:23] <Darth_Crumpet> Probe.
[09:23] <Cylka> OK, the tag needs to be added.
[09:23] <Cylka> Probe.
[09:23] <grunny> probe
[09:23] <Darth_Crumpet> Damn Starships and Vehicles ... :P
[09:23] <Cylka> Bevel is probed.
[09:23] <Cylka> Next: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Zuckuss
[09:24] <Cylka> —update needed from Starships and Vehicles 8.
[09:24] <Cylka> * The update is not the only issue with this one. It needs a good copyedit, expanded introduction, slight reworking of some of the prose that lends to OR; it also fails the LG as it stands now and desperately needs the Bts rewritten and sectioned for cohesion. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 01:36, September 3, 2010 (UTC
[09:24] <grunny> Probe.
[09:24] <Darth_Burger> STRONG PROBE
[09:24] <IFYLOFD> Probe.
[09:24] <Cylka> Probe.
[09:25] <Darth_Burger> !!!!!!!!!!!
[09:25] <Nuku-Nuku> Darth_Burger: Error: "!!!!!!!!!!" is not a valid command.
[09:25] <grunny> haha
[09:25] <Darth_Burger> haha
[09:25] <Darth_Crumpet> Probe.
[09:25] <Cylka> Zuckuss is probed.
[09:25] -->| Fiolli (~Fiolli@wikia/Jedimasterfiolli) has joined #wookieepedia-inquisitorius
[09:25] =-= Mode #wookieepedia-inquisitorius +o Fiolli by ChanServ
[09:25] =-= Mode #wookieepedia-inquisitorius +o Fiolli by Nuku-Nuku
[09:25] <grunny> hey Fiolli
[09:25] <Cylka> Hey Fiolli.
[09:26] <Fiolli> Hey, guys. Sorry I'm late, but I made it.
[09:26] <grunny> :)
[09:26] <Fiolli> Where are we at?
[09:26] <Darth_Burger> hey Fiolli
[09:26] <Cylka> Good. We're about halfway through the new articles.
[09:26] <Cylka> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Kouhun
[09:26] <Fiolli> Ah, yes. "Kill with insecticide"
[09:26] <Cylka> update needed from Starships and Vehicles 31.
[09:27] <grunny> Probe.
[09:27] <IFYLOFD> Probe.
[09:27] <Cylka> probe
[09:27] <Darth_Crumpet> Probe.
[09:27] <Cylka> Tope?
[09:27] <Darth_Burger> PROBE THAT POS! :P
[09:27] <Cylka> The insects are probed. :D
[09:28] <Cylka> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Slave_Leia_costume
[09:28] <Cylka> Recently added material has been tagged {{Fact}} and needs to be verified and either sourced/cleaned up or removed if incorrect. [Redacted by administration] —Master Jonathan (Jedi Council Chambers) 01:06, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
[09:28] <Darth_Burger> AUTOMATIC PROBE
[09:29] <IFYLOFD> Probe.
[09:29] <Fiolli> Probation
[09:29] <Darth_Crumpet> [Redacted by administration]
[09:29] <IFYLOFD> [Redacted by administration]
[09:29] <grunny> probe
[09:29] * Fiolli [Redacted by administration]
[09:29] <Cylka> Actually that is from Robot Chicken.
[09:30] * Fiolli is unfamiliar with Robot Chicken
[09:30] <Cylka> I remember seeing it. I can fix that if that is the only issue.
[09:30] * Fiolli prefers real chicken; baked with apples and spinach.
[09:31] <Cylka> I would spare it and fix it.
[09:31] <Cylka> Others say probe, so probe?
[09:32] <Cylka> OK, Slave Leia is probed.
[09:32] <Cylka> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Vuffi_Raa
[09:32] <Cylka> Underlinking and some POV issues. Cylka-talk- 09:47, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
[09:33] <Darth_Crumpet> Probe.
[09:33] <Cylka> The undelinking could probably be {{sofixit}}, but I did notice some POV issues.
[09:33] <IFYLOFD> Probe.
[09:33] <Cylka> Probe.
[09:33] <Darth_Burger> probe
[09:34] <Fiolli> Yes, underlinking is definitely a {{Sofixit}} thing, in my opinion.
[09:34] <Fiolli> POV issues, warrants a probe.
[09:34] <grunny> probe for POV
[09:34] <Cylka> Alright Vuffi probed for POV.
[09:34] <Cylka> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Diergu-Rea_Duhnes%27rd
[09:34] <Cylka> —Fact tags in infobox and body. Grunny (talk) 14:41, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
[09:35] <grunny> Probe.
[09:35] <Darth_Crumpet> Probe.
[09:35] <Cylka> probe
[09:35] <IFYLOFD> Probe.
[09:35] <Fiolli> ...probation...
[09:36] <Darth_Burger> PROBE WITH SCISSORS
[09:36] <Cylka> Right. Duhnes'rd is probed.
[09:36] <grunny> just as long as you're not running while you do it
[09:36] <Fiolli> XD
[09:37] <Cylka> Running with scissors has a great game out: Postal 2
[09:37] <Cylka> You go postal and kill eeveryone. :P
[09:37] <Cylka> Next: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Carth_Onasi
[09:37] <Cylka> update tag.
[09:37] <grunny> Probe.
[09:37] <Cylka> probe.
[09:37] <Darth_Crumpet> Probe.
[09:38] <Darth_Burger> PROBE WITH SCISSORS WHILE BICYCLE RIDING
[09:38] <IFYLOFD> Probe.
[09:38] <grunny> :O
[09:38] <grunny> :P
[09:38] <Cylka> Onasi is probed.
[09:39] <Fiolli> Oh yeah. Probe.
[09:39] <Cylka> Now for the last one, from the maintenance page: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Noval_Garaint
[09:39] <Cylka> update tag.
[09:39] <Cylka> Probe.
[09:39] <grunny> the user who added the update tag, didn't add it to the sources
[09:40] <IFYLOFD> Probe.
[09:40] <Darth_Burger> PROBE WITH GUILLOTINE
[09:40] <grunny> Probe.
[09:40] <Fiolli> Probe, I suppose.
[09:40] <Darth_Crumpet> SavageBob put it on the talk page.
[09:40] <Fiolli> Not sure what the source is, though.
[09:40] <Darth_Crumpet> Probe.
[09:40] <Fiolli> Oh, I see now.
[09:41] <grunny> ah
[09:41] <Cylka> Garaint is a probe then.
[09:41] <Darth_Burger> I have another one.
[09:41] -->| Xicer9 (~hasankhan@urwireless-dhcp-128-151-21-202.wireless.rochester.edu) has joined #wookieepedia-inquisitorius
[09:41] =-= Mode #wookieepedia-inquisitorius +o Xicer9 by ChanServ
[09:41] <grunny> Hey Xicer
[09:41] <Darth_Burger> This requires some explanation too.
[09:41] <Cylka> Hey Xicer.
[09:41] <grunny> almost missed it :P
[09:41] <Xicer9> Meeting still going on?
[09:42] <Cylka> Go ahead Tope.
[09:42] <grunny> yep, just at the end of new articles
[09:42] <Xicer9> Cool
[09:42] <Darth_Burger> Drovian was reviewed last meeting for LG issues. http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Drovian
[09:42] <Darth_Burger> I convinced everyone not to probe, since I thought it was an easy enough fix that I could just do it.
[09:42] <Darth_Burger> I did fix some of it, but as I was going through I realized it was beyond my knowledge.
[09:43] <Darth_Burger> Meaning the original nominator should go in and finish the fix-up.
[09:43] <Darth_Burger> I left a discussion topic on the Drovian talk page, which has not received a response.
[09:43] <Fiolli> Ok. Probe, then.
[09:43] -->| GrandMoffTranner (~Tranner@wikia/GrandMoffTranner) has joined #wookieepedia-inquisitorius
[09:43] =-= Mode #wookieepedia-inquisitorius +o GrandMoffTranner by ChanServ
[09:43] <Darth_Burger> I recommend probe so the article can be fixed completely
[09:43] =-= Mode #wookieepedia-inquisitorius +o GrandMoffTranner by Nuku-Nuku
[09:43] <Cylka> Hey Tranner.
[09:43] <Xicer9> Tranner
[09:43] <Fiolli> Hello, Xicer; Tranner.
[09:43] <Darth_Crumpet> Probe.
[09:43] <grunny> hey Tranner
[09:43] <Xicer9> Probify
[09:43] <Darth_Burger> I vote probe.
[09:43] <Cylka> Eyrezer is still around so he can fix it.
[09:43] <grunny> Probe.
[09:44] <GrandMoffTranner> Hey everyone. Sorry I'm late.
[09:44] <Cylka> Probe.
[09:44] <Fiolli> Probe-a-licious.
[09:44] <Cylka> Tranner: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Drovian
[09:44] <GrandMoffTranner> Ah, thank you.
[09:45] <GrandMoffTranner> Probe.
[09:45] <Cylka> Darth_Burger> I convinced everyone not to probe, since I thought it was an easy enough fix that I could just do it.
[09:45] <Cylka> [19:43] <Darth_Burger> I did fix some of it, but as I was going through I realized it was beyond my knowledge.
[09:45] <Cylka> [19:43] <Darth_Burger> Meaning the original nominator should go in and finish the fix-up.
[09:45] <Cylka> [19:43] <Darth_Burger> I left a discussion topic on the Drovian talk page, which has not received a response.
[09:45] <Cylka> Alrighty, Drovian is a probe.
[09:45] <Cylka> Does anyone else have any other articles they want reviewed?
[09:45] <grunny> nope
[09:46] <Cylka> Otherwise we move onto the discussion topic.
[09:47] <Cylka> Reducing the amount of time for a nom to be considered inactive from one month to three weeks. We have a barrage of noms on the page and inactivity shouldn't be tolerated. Similar to the current inactivity policy of two weeks on the GAN. Grunny (talk) 06:08, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
[09:48] <grunny> Jiggles, CC and Chack would all be for lowering it to two weeks.
[09:48] <Fiolli> Absolutely not.
[09:48] <Fiolli> Three weeks, not two.
[09:48] * Fiolli had to get that in.
[09:48] <Xicer9> Two seems a bit too restrictive
[09:48] <IFYLOFD> I vote for three.
[09:49] <Cylka> Eh, I could go for either one, but I think that three would probably be better.
[09:49] <Darth_Burger> Three isn't bad at all.
[09:49] <Darth_Burger> I support three.
[09:49] <GrandMoffTranner> As do I.
[09:49] <grunny> eh, if you can't stay on top of your nom's objections, you shouldn't have nominated it
[09:49] <Xicer9> Three for now, and if it's still a problem we could talking about lowering it more later
[09:49] <grunny> but I support three for now
[09:49] <Cylka> The other absentees support three.
[09:49] <Darth_Crumpet> Support for three.
[09:50] <Cylka> Alright, so we vote to reduce the time for objections from four to three weeks.
[09:50] <Fiolli> Now, I want us to make sure we have (while not a codified procedure) a plan to warn users after 14-17 days that idleness has come up.
[09:50] <Fiolli> I think that is only proper.
[09:50] <Darth_Burger> I disagree with that, for one reason:
[09:50] <grunny> I'm not really sure about that
[09:50] <grunny> people should be aware of their nom's situation
[09:51] <Darth_Burger> What we do on the GAN page is just a post a big honking bold big as hell warning: All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to removal by AgriCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 2 weeks.
[09:51] <Darth_Burger> You can't miss it.
[09:51] <IFYLOFD> If they can't stay on top of their noms, to hell with them.
[09:51] <Cylka> Yeah, I don't think that it's our responsibility to warn users.
[09:51] <Darth_Burger> If people can't read the rules, that's not our problem
[09:51] <grunny> per Floyd :P
[09:51] <Darth_Burger> We shouldn't be chasing after them off the page
[09:51] <Fiolli> I'm absolutely not suggesting that we list it on their talk page. I'm only saying that someone would say something on the nom page.
[09:51] <Darth_Burger> Ok, I read you wrong then
[09:51] <Darth_Burger> But even so, I don't think it's our responsibility.
[09:52] <GrandMoffTranner> I believe a general warning would be sufficient. Individual warnings are unnecessary, imo.
[09:52] <Darth_Burger> They can and should be reading the rules. And we can make it huge and bold for them so they can't miss it
[09:52] <Cylka> Oh, sure. We'll add a notice like on the AC page.
[09:52] <grunny> I say we just put the same warning that is on the GAN on the FAN
[09:52] <Fiolli> It may not be, and I don't think it is. But, saying simply "this nomination has been sitting idle for two weeks now, please get working or it will be removed" is not difficult.
[09:52] <Darth_Burger> If you, personally, and I say that for everyone in general, want to leave a notice, by all means.
[09:52] <Darth_Burger> But I don't think it should be required as practice
[09:52] <Cylka> Per Tope.
[09:53] <Cylka> Users need to be responsible for the noms.
[09:53] <GrandMoffTranner> Per Tope.
[09:53] <Cylka> their*
[09:53] <Darth_Burger> I don't want some wikilawyer coming to me after I remove a nom and complain that it should be put back up because I didn't leave a removal notice
[09:53] <Xicer9> I guess I have to agree
[09:53] <Fiolli> We should be making it easier for users to become involved, not aiming to "kick them off the page" or damn them to hell. Seriously, that's a huge attitude problem.
[09:53] <grunny> plus, we may not notice that a nom has been inactive until it gets to three weeks, and we're not going to wait until we warn them first
[09:53] <IFYLOFD> If some fucker can't be responsible for his affairs, to hell with him!
[09:53] <grunny> haha
[09:54] <Fiolli> Shut up, Floyd.
[09:54] <Cylka> I don't want to kick users off the page, but if someone wants to nominate an article, they need to keep up with it.
[09:54] <Fiolli> I'm not saying we have a codified policy. I'm saying that informally, when someone notices there is a nom that has been 14-17 days, tell them!
[09:54] <IFYLOFD> Well if you want to do it yourself Fiolli, do it.
[09:55] <Cylka> I think that is fine as long as there isn't a policy.
[09:55] <Fiolli> I have done it, but I can't keep track of every nom.
[09:55] <Cylka> Otherwise we will have wikilawering.
[09:55] <Darth_Crumpet> Seriously, though, I thought that's why we switched to subpages - so nominators could keep better track of their noms.
[09:55] <grunny> ^
[09:55] <Cylka> Ok, and I can't spell. :P
[09:56] <Cylka> Crumpet?
[09:56] <Fiolli> Again... let me make this clear: no codified "policy" that "requires" us to do this. I'm saying we have an "informal procedure" whereby someone does it as a "courtesy."
[09:56] <Cylka> Ok, if someone notices an inactive nom, they can inform the nominator.
[09:57] <Cylka> But not required to.
[09:57] <Cylka> Nor, will the removal be delayed because of a nominator not being informed.
[09:57] <Fiolli> It's simply an act of good faith, people.
[09:57] <Cylka> We can try to be nice. :P
[09:58] <Xicer9> It should be encouraged, yes
[09:58] <Xicer9> But no policy
[09:58] <IFYLOFD> Well if its totally informal and has nothing to do with making a policy, why bring it up here?
[09:58] <IFYLOFD> Just do it.
[09:58] <grunny> if an Inq chooses to, they can, but there's no reason to put anything down
[09:58] <Fiolli> I bring it up because it (sadly) needs to be brought up.
[09:58] <Xicer9> And I'd go for having that GAN notice on the FAN page
[09:59] <Cylka> Ok, so we can informally tell other Inqs, but not have it written anywhere but on the meeting log.
[09:59] <grunny> (y)
[09:59] <Darth_Crumpet> Aye.
[10:00] <Darth_Burger> per Xicer
[10:00] <Xicer9> Sure
[10:00] <Cylka> SO we are all agreed?
[10:01] <Fiolli> Fair enough.
[10:01] <Cylka> Alright, just an offical switch from four to three weeks on objections.
[10:01] <Cylka> Anyone have anything else they want to bring up?
[10:01] <Fiolli> Yes, I do.
[10:02] <Cylka> Go ahead.
[10:02] <Fiolli> Since I'm not making friends tonight, I'll bring up something that also came up earlier.
[10:02] <IFYLOFD> Aw Fiolli, you're still my friend :P
[10:02] * grunny throws Fiolli a cookie
[10:03] * Cylka blows Fiolli a kiss.
[10:03] <Darth_Burger> we all need beer
[10:03] <Darth_Burger> beer fixes everything
[10:03] <Fiolli> I would like for articles under review (not nominations) that underlinking issues fall solely under {{Sofixit}}. AWB can help in really bad cases. This should not be an issue for too many noms, as most newer ones have been thoroughly searched.
[10:03] <IFYLOFD> Then it's settled. Tranner buys the beer.
[10:03] * Fiolli doesn't drink, so that's one less beer.
[10:03] <GrandMoffTranner> Meh. Fair enough.
[10:03] <grunny> yeah, we kinda settled that while probing earlier, fiolli
[10:03] <Fiolli> Ok.
[10:04] * Darth_Crumpet will have a whisky and cigars.
[10:04] <Fiolli> I've spoken my peace on that one, then.
[10:04] <grunny> but we can make a note on the meeting minutes for those who won't read the log :P
[10:04] <Fiolli> Yes, please.
[10:04] <Cylka> That we can do.
[10:04] <Xicer9> Hydro says there's nothing new to add to Kouhun
[10:04] <IFYLOFD> Dammit Cav, you will have a beer, and you will like it!
[10:04] <Cylka> Anything else?
[10:04] * Fiolli thanks grunny for the cookie and Cylka for the kiss.
[10:04] <Xicer9> Did you guys vote to probe that one?
[10:05] <grunny> which one?
[10:05] <IFYLOFD> Kouhun.
[10:05] <Darth_Crumpet> Well, I probably would enjoy the beer, but I'd prefer the whisky.
[10:05] <Xicer9> Kouhun
[10:05] <Cylka> Yes, we did.
[10:05] <grunny> yes
[10:05] <Fiolli> Is that for certain?
[10:05] <Fiolli> We can vote to keep at the next meeting, then.
[10:05] <Fiolli> ;)
[10:06] <Xicer9> The only thing I recall that could be added is that they release that flesh-liquefying agent through their saliva
[10:06] <Xicer9> I'm not sure there's anything else that needs to be updated
[10:07] <Cylka> Well, maybe we should keep the probe then so it can be checked out if no one is really sure.
[10:07] <Darth_Burger> works for me
[10:07] <Xicer9> Alright
[10:07] <grunny> sure
[10:07] <Fiolli> Probably the wise idea, just to be safe.
[10:07] <Cylka> K, we keep the probe.
[10:07] <Fiolli> It's not like it was up for kill.
[10:07] <Fiolli> Although... talk about last minute if it was.
[10:08] <Cylka> haha
[10:08] <Xicer9> heh
[10:08] <Cylka> Anything else?
[10:08] <Cylka> going once...
[10:08] * Fiolli passes a bottle of scotch to Darth_Crumpet and a beer to Darth_Burger
[10:08] <Fiolli> Anyone else? ;)
[10:08] <Cylka> going twice...
[10:08] <Cylka> aaaaaand we are done. :p
[10:09] * Darth_Crumpet thanks Fiolli for the scotch :)
[10:09] <Fiolli> No problem, Cav.
[10:09] <Cylka> Thanks to everyone for coming. :)
[10:09] <Fiolli> :)
[10:09] * Darth_Crumpet lights up a nice montechristo cigar.