Mickey Suttle

  • Status: Former featured Article (other options are "featured article", "former featured article", and "article")

Things to do

  • Point of View issues
  • Lack of sourcing
  • Large majority of article written as lists.
  • Disorganized with improper formatting.

Removal of FA status

  • FA status removed per IRC meeting.

Keep Remove

Comments

  • Mind telling us why you want to commit this act of utter foolishness? KEJ 14:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Because the article is not of FA quality? --Imp 14:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
      • And why is that? I wish the Inqs, or whoever's in charge of this, would inform us why they decide nominate an FA for de-FA-ification. KEJ 14:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
        • Read the meeting logs for now, we'll get the comments up when we can. This was our first meeting of this sort; it's going to have its kinks. - Lord Hydronium 14:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Questioning the methods of the Inquisitorius is dangerous. :P Red XIV 05:54, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I think the better question would be, do we want SuperShadow to remain an FA? -- SFH 16:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
    • No, I think the better question would be "Do we even need the SuperShadow page on the site... Piequals3 13:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)