Wookieepedia:Inq/Jon (farmer)

Jon (farmer)

• Status: Featured article

Support

1. Four Dot has gone completely mad. .... 07:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
2. Cull Tremayne 11:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
3. Violating WP:POINT isn't a rules-based objection. -- Darth Culator ^{(Talk)(Kills)} 22:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
   • And...as I constantly say...it's not a violation of POINT. .... 06:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
4. --Eyrezer 12:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
5. Lord Hydronium 03:25, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
6. Atarumaster88 ^{(Audience Chamber)} 22:40, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Nomination violates WP:POINT. Sry 4dot :P It's more of an actual guideline, anways. —Xwing328^(Talk) 03:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

• I have to admit, that is awesome. :-P Cull Tremayne 21:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  • It does not violate POINT, because I did not disrupt Wookieepedia to prove a point, I improved it to prove a point. And if that's against policy then that's the single stupidest policy I've heard since the "If he's circumcised, kill him" policy of the roaring...erm...30s in Europe. .... 22:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
    • That was more 40s than 30s. -LtNOWIS 06:21, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

1. Some rather dodgy statements: "normally a docile man," "a well-known farmer," and similar that seem more rhetorically than factually inspired. Havac 02:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
   • Most farmers new of him and mentioned him, and when the whole ordeal is over and things are back to normal, he's calm. .... 02:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Things to do

The pic with Revan needs to be removed. We can't have non-canon or possibly-canon pics in the main section if we have to point out their canonical status, because the main article is in-universe. Same reason we don't want GUIs in screenshots or the word "canon" mentioned in the main article, which it is in the caption. Havac 05:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

• Addressed. Havac 03:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

• You keep getting awesomer and awesomer. Adamwankenobi 07:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Actually, this is just to prove a point. But I can't be touched, since I'm not disrupting Wookieepedia. Unlike *ahem* Oxygen. .... 10:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
    • How are you proving a point? This isn't a Burl Ives type of article. Adamwankenobi 21:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
      • Some people on IRC claimed that not every article could be an FA, and brought up Jon the Farmer as an example. Cull Tremayne 21:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
        • LOL! Go 4dot! Adamwankenobi 21:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
• As I said on the FA page, I think it could be improved with some quotes, even if it is not a strict requirement. I'm getting a bit sick of the posturing that's going on, though. --Eyrezer 12:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)