Wookieepedia:Inq/HK-47

< Wookieepedia:Inq
Wookieepedia > Wookieepedia:Inquisitorius > Inq/HK-47

HK-47

  • Status: Failed Featured Article nom

Support

  • vote here

Remove nomination

  • Vote here

Things to do

  • Objection: The White Album has more variety in the image department than this. .... 01:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
    • 4dot. Do you have any pictures of HK that aren't of a dark orange-ish metallic droid with a blaster rifle?;~P Azzt
      • Well, c'mon, let's have some shots of him in combat. .... 22:34, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Main image is horrible. Could also do with not having his Galaxies appearance outsize the rest of his history. Havac 02:36, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Besides better image use (spacing and sizing), prose could use some cleanup in places, particularly in the "From master to master" section. - breathesgelatinTalk 18:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Removal of FA status

  • We would vote here. Currently N/A for this article

Strike Objection

  • List an objection here. Be specific. Quote the objection.

Objection by QuentinGeorge

  • "In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)"

Remove


Keep

  1. I've already replied on the FA page that it's his right to object, even if I had originally planned otherwise. Posting an objection to be stricken by a non-Inquisitor is okay, but realize that we're not out to strike legitimate objections by other users. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 19:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  2. Havac 02:36, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
  3. I really don't like the idea of us striking valid objections based on the criteria by established users who are following up. That's not hte point of the Inq. - breathesgelatinTalk 18:40, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
  4. ATATatarismall.png 18:02, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

  • According to a comment made by Atarumaster88, the new rules to not apply to the upper articles, since they were nominated before the rules were initiated. That is why I put QuintenGeorge's comment up to be striked.--IG-Prime(IG-2000) 20:01, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Good point. I thought that Ataru was the first article to fall under the new rules. .... 21:25, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
    • It was going to be. But QuentinGeorge disagreed, and though I disagree with him, I'm not going to strike all his objections. There was a thread in the Senate Hall about it. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 21:38, 11 February 2007 (UTC)