Wookieepedia:Inq/Burl Ives

< Wookieepedia:Inq
Wookieepedia > Wookieepedia:Inquisitorius > Inq/Burl Ives

Burl Ives

  • Status: Featured Article

Support

  1. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 02:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  2. Despite there being basically no information about his work on Star Wars (only because there really isn't any), it's a good article. Cull Tremayne 21:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  3. Lord Hydronium 00:20, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
  4. .... 00:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
  5. ATATatarismall.png 02:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  6. StarNeptuneTalk to me! 17:49, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  7. I still don't understand the bizarre hatred for this article. Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 22:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Cull back non-Star Wars related material. At the least hold off until the current forum on the issue is decided. Incidentally, a new position has been added to the vote. --Eyrezer 09:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. Per Eyrezer on holding off until forum ends. —Unsigned comment by Atarumaster88 (talk • contribs)
    • This has now been adressed and no longer applies. Thefourdotelipsis 00:33, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Things to do

  1. Diction of the predicates could use some sprucing up. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 21:49, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. Lack of external internal links. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 23:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
    • They're all in the refsection, nitpicker. You don't repeat them if you've listed them already. .... 00:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
      • I meant internal. My mistake- no need to call others names. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 00:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
        • Bah. It can't have internal links. You can't apply that rule to this article. .... 00:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
          • If there's something in Burl Ive's article that can be linked to on Wookieepedia, it should be, no? Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 03:02, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
            • And it is. Apart from, like, 1909. Is that what you're alluding to? .... 03:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  3. Expansion of SW narration role: any quotes or other information besides the fact that he narrated it? —Xwing328(Talk) 20:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
    • It's not a well documented film. Not much to say about a narration job. You walk into a booth and say the lines. To expand it would be folly. .... 22:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Strikage of Objections

Objection by Jaymach

"Because it contains too much information that's not relevant to a Star Wars encyclopedia."
―Jaymach

Keep

Remove

  1. Objection: Objection is objectionable. There is nothing in the FA criteria that applies to this. The article is at "Burl Ives", and so, it should contain information relevant to him, Star Wars or not. .... 22:26, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I'm just going to strike the objection, because it clearly doesn't fall under any rules, which is what was decided at a certain CT thread we're so fond of. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 22:28, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

  • With two Inqs voting against this article, the nom is not approved, right? Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 04:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  • If we all stipulate that 4dot has proven whatever the hell it is he's trying to prove, will he, for the love of God, stop with the Burl Ives crap? Enochf 11:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Sure. Because his article is complete. And once it becomes FA, it will have completed its...uh...life. Plus, I don't think Burl's doing much these days. .... 23:11, 9 April 2007 (UTC)