Wookieepedia:Inq/Bastila Shan

This page is an archive of an Inquisitorius discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments on this article should be made in a separate thread in the appropriate category of the Inquisitorius forum rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the discussion was promote to Featured Article. - Lord Hydronium 01:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Bastila Shan

• Status: Featured Article (formerly featured article nomination)

Support

1. .... 00:10, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
2. Lord Hydronium 08:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
3. Havac 21:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
4. Atarumaster88 ^{(Audience Chamber)} 01:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Things to do

• List stuff to do here. But don't object only here. Object at WP:FA.
• Everything's good but that one image that needs sourcing (or replacing), and sourcing the article (should be easy). - Lord Hydronium 07:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
• Few things left to source- intro, and every paragraph, please. Atarumaster88 ^{(Audience Chamber)} 21:42, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Intros need to be sourced? I thought that since they just summarized information from the sections below that those sources would suffice. - Lord Hydronium 23:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Addendum: if we have multiple paragraphs in a row all from the same source, I think sourcing each one is overkill and just makes it unnecessarily crowded. - Lord Hydronium 23:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
    • There's a Senate Hall thread about a template we can use if the whole heading is from the same source. Use the {{ref}} template. Atarumaster88 ^{(Audience Chamber)} 00:20, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
      • All right, it's entirely sourced. Personally, I think it's overdoing it and looks ugly as sin in a couple cases, but if it's the rules, then there we go. - Lord Hydronium 01:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Removal of FA status

• We would vote here. Currently N/A for this article

Strike Objection

• List an objection here. Be specific. Quote the objection.

Objection by Rezendi and Imperialles

Remove

1. The intro might use a bit of cleanup, but not in length. As for Imp's, some of his others still need to be addressed, so I'm just focusing on this part. Lord Hydronium 00:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
2. .... 01:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
3. Atarumaster88 ^{(Audience Chamber)} 02:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
4. Long since fixed. -- Darth Culator ^{(Talk)(Kills)} 02:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
5. Havac 21:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep

• Objection go bye-bye. Havac 21:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Objection by AtomicKetchup

Remove

1. Not even a valid objection. - Lord Hydronium 00:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
2. That's exactly the kind of objection we exist to kill. Havac 01:01, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
3. Purge. .... 01:03, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
4. Havac says it well. Atarumaster88 ^{(Audience Chamber)} 02:03, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
5. Seriously, we should just ignore that whenever it comes up. -- Darth Culator ^{(Talk)(Kills)} 02:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

• Per consensus, this objection has been marked as overriden. Atarumaster88 ^{(Audience Chamber)} 02:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep

Comments

• A few in-game screenshots of Bastilla in combat or whatever would be nice, but I think that's pushing image overkill. .... 00:13, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • The image density looks good to me, but File:BastilaShan.jpg still needs a source. If that can't be found, a screenshot could take its place. - Lord Hydronium 00:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
    • It's in the same style of the character renders from the LucasArts site, but I can't find it there. -- Darth Culator ^{(Talk)(Kills)} 02:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
• Wrapped in a bow and put in the queue. - Lord Hydronium 06:52, 23 February 2007 (UTC)