Wookieepedia:Inq/Armand Isard

This page is an archive of an Inquisitorius discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments on this article should be made in a separate thread in the appropriate category of the Inquisitorius forum rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the discussion was promote to Featured Article. - Lord Hydronium 01:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Armand Isard

• Status: Featured Article (formerly featured article nomination)

Support

1. "Hey, you wrote it!" .... 21:50, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
2. Cull Tremayne 22:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC) -- It's always fun when a barely referenced character gets his sources tied together in a professional way.
3. Lord Hydronium 22:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
4. Darth Culator ^{(Talk)(Kills)} 02:53, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
5. StarNeptune^{Talk to me!} 06:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Things to do

Comments

• Would it be possible to clean up this image (remove bubble) and have it as the main image. It seems to be a much better drawing. Cull Tremayne 22:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
  • I would like that very much. .... 00:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• A question was posted on this article's talk page about the II-ISB connection. A BTS note would be a good idea. -- Darth Culator ^{(Talk)(Kills)} 05:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  • I don't see the conflict. .... 05:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
    • I, and at least 1 other person, do. QuentinGeorge 06:40, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
      • Well, I will admit that one person controling both agencies is seemingly contradictory, but so too is having one man in charge of both sides of a war. .... 06:45, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
    • I've added a BtS. It's an error - no doubt about it, especially since Cruyea Vandron was mentioned in other sources as the founding head of ISB. QuentinGeorge 22:37, 17 February 2007 (UTC)