Wookieepedia:Good article reviews/Rokak'k Baran

< Wookieepedia:Good article reviews
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article that failed review. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Rokak'k Baran
    • 1.1 Object
    • 1.2 Comments
    • 1.3 Vote to retain Good status
    • 1.4 Vote to strip Good status

Rokak'k Baran

  • Requested By: —spookywillowwtalk
  • Date Requested: 15:57, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Date Archived: 00:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Object

  • A subject-linked relevant image can be tucked in the History.
  • Licha In and Asation technically needs context, as both are not in the same sentence as the other contextualized worlds.
  • That attack mentioned in the last two sentences of the History seems like it could have its own page stubbed to link.
  • The HNN content should be contextualized as if reported in the CoCo Edition of the IU HNN as most HNN noms are nowadays.
  • Unsourced BTS, which also requires the month and other context traditional nowadays for Adventure Journal BTS sections. Some of the later bits can also be chopped.—spookywillowwtalk 15:57, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Comments

  • Marked as on probation at 1 month unaddressed. Lewisr (talk) 00:02, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Vote to retain Good status

Vote to strip Good status

  1. ACvote Two months unaddressed Lewisr (talk) 00:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
  2. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 00:11, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Zed42 Wolfpack emblem (talk) 00:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)