- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article that passed review. Please do not modify it.
Adjudicator
- Requested By: ThrawnChiss7
Assembly Cupola - Date Requested: 13:37, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Date Archived: 00:08, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Object
ThrawnChiss
- Similar to the Tyrant, the Adjudicator appeared in RotJ and TESB in Legends, and per the notability policy, that appearance also carries over to the canon article. ThrawnChiss7 Assembly Cupola 13:37, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Just noting here that it actually does not appear in TESB (see my note in the BTS); however, its Rotj appearance still applies and info about that needs to be added. ThrawnChiss7 Assembly Cupola 22:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Just to have on record here, I've started a Senate Hall thread about the use of this practice, so I'll see how that goes before making any changes here. Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 14:56, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- OK, since the CT has passed and WP:NP#New canon subjects has now been changed, this objection no longer applies. I have modified the article to reflect this, including removing reference to ESB and RotJ in canon, tidying up the Legends section, and adding a new image. Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 17:15, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Just noting here that it actually does not appear in TESB (see my note in the BTS); however, its Rotj appearance still applies and info about that needs to be added. ThrawnChiss7
Comments
- Leaving a note here for bot's sake: formally on pause timer-wise until the SH wraps up.—spookywillowwtalk 00:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Likewise, for posterity's sake, noting that the above debate has been taken to the consensus track. Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 18:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Vote to retain Good status
Per the CT passing —spookywillowwtalk 23:49, 31 March 2024 (UTC)- Lewisr (talk) 23:49, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Master Fredcerique(talk) (he/him) 00:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
